I was thinking about this the other day- There are a good number of reps out there with some pretty convincing features and characteristics, such as realistic serial numbers that actually fall within a genuine serial or milesimation range. While this is a very nice detail for those of us interested in reps, I feel a bit badly for the owners of the actual genuines with that particular number that coincides with the replication. Especially when that particular number is mass produced on the reps; I can see how that would contribute to devaluation of that particular genuine in terms of legitimacy and integrity.
However, I do think the unique milesimation numbers on pieces like the 2893-2 PAM GMTs etc. was a very nice touch. I recall the surprise that I, along with many others had when this model first came out (roughly a yer ago) and caseback numbers were first compared. I have to imagine that such a feature was specifically for us, the enthusiasts on the boards who pay attention to such details. If such is the case, then I think that's proof that we are all actively helping to shape the direction of our hobby, and the manufacturers are taking note of what we want
But, I digress just a bit... Back on topic...
So, my question is this- Does the serial or milesimation stamping on your rep watch matter to you? And, how do you feel about having a realistic number? Important, or no? And, my final hypothetical question... If you[/] were the owner of the genuine that had a serial or prod number that was widely known to be used in reps; would that change the way you thought or felt about your watch?
Just some curiosity from me on the subject. Not trying to stir any pots of ruffle any feathers. Rather... I'm just a bit bored on a Weds morning, and wanted to get some general discussion going...
Best regards,
Randy