My beliefs are, since it's inception into the arts & aesthetics--because through its color properties alone--gold is "flashier" and the color was & is primarily utilized in jewelery to stand out above other colors; to be more noticeable & to make a "bolder" statement. SS makes a completely different statement than TT, which in turn makes a different statement than full gold. But I was raised in an aesthetic sense to believe that "less is more"; personally, I believe flashy=tacky...just look around at most people. It's best not to display class through overstatement, so as not to look pretentious. To me, wearing full gold is the equivalent of wearing clothing with the name brand stamped on the outside of it--comically--for those who are insecure & feel the need to constantly tell others what label they're wearing; "VERSACE", "RALPH LAUREN", "JUICY"--it just looks in poor taste. That is, one does this in an attempt to prominently display their "status" to others, but it's generally only those without real money that spend so much trying to make it look like they actually have some. I think--for the most part, but not for everyone--these actions show how underdeveloped someone's taste is and how little respect they actually have for money. The irony there is that you'd have more money if you didn't spend it on frivolous things & in such ridiculous ways. Money & taste are certainly not relative, and for the most part I think you'll find that "flash" or "bling", as it were, is considered by most educated people to display lack of taste, rather than the other way around. But then again, there are plenty of people who would say this about anyone with wearing a Rolex on their wrist--regardless of the metal.
Everything you wear makes a statement, and some can pull off full gold without looking like they're screaming. But of course, to each his own, and more power to him/her for going with the full gold look if that's your flavor du jour. I just prefer a more toned-down approach; I'm guessing because that's primarily what you see here (and elsewhere) that the general consensus is roughly the same?