freddy333

My apolgies, Lani. I appreciate all of your efforts & I am sure everything will be fine.

Ok, I know what you are talking about -- the sweep wheel tension spring. But he said the twitchyness started all of a sudden overnight & it seems odd that a spring would suddenly become bent or dislodged that fast, especially when the watch was just resting on a nightstand. But I will definitely check that. The uneven motion also is unaffected by the watch's position & I already checked the beat (nearly dead-on, amplitude is about 300). Even flat on its back, the second hand is twitchy, so I am kind of leaning toward dirty pallet stones.......or maybe the hand just simply came loose on its pinion? Thanks RG.

I was going to suggest the same thing, but I did not want to be the 1 to beat this dead horse.

As usual, Avitt is spot-on. The only thing I would add is that if you want the correct (asymmetrical) pusher layout, you have 3 movement choices -- V72, V23 (same as V72, but without the hour totalizer - you fit a 'phantom' (fixed position) subdial hand in place of the missing hour totalizer hand of the V72) or an asymmetrical-pushered A7750 (these movements are harder to find than Valjoux movements). The movement on the right is a Lemania/Venus copy If you can live without the asymmetrical pushers & do not mind 'freezing' the hour totalizer subdial hand, the Lemania/Venus movement is a good alternative option. These movements are still in production, silky smooth & bulletproof. This is a Lemania/Venus 6263

I was hoping to hear that someone purchased something from the site via Paypal in the past 1-3 days. But thank you for the input.

RWG is running slow again.

That day is here. You can get a polarizing filter to place over your laptop (or desktop) monitor screen that limits the viewing area to directly in front of the screen & eliminates off-angle snooping.

Or use the Adblock image option in the Firefox browser to remove/block it (as well as any other images on a page). Firefox is free & better than IE anyway.

No offense, but Mickey's answer is mostly correct (but I would shy away from the GMTIIC due to its movement issues). If the inmate wants a 'gold' watch, then you might do better by asking him which he wants instead of any of us. To my eye, neither of the 2 watches you posted are very good.

Anyone use Paypal to purchase a rep from silix-prime within the past few days?

Doc's comments speak for themselves.

Not sure about that dealer or how well that watch would look on a man's wrist, but I am sure your girlfriend will love it. Good luck.

Just do not try to import/export fake Olympics merchandise! The Chinese government cracks down swiftly & brutally on Olympics fakes & the factories & sellers that market them. Read about China's Logo Crackdown This is also relevant to RWG members - Beijing Takes Aim at Counterfeit Goods

On gen dials, the word 'COMEX' is painted gloss black against a semi-gloss white background. Also, the 'O' is usually slightly squared. It is hard to tell from the sellers pictures whether that is the case on this dial or if 'COMEX' is just the background dial color, which is the way nearly all aftermarket dials are printed Seller does have a 100% rating from a small number of previous watch sales, but, overall, I have to agree with Doc on this 1 -- caveat emptor. __________ Update -- Actually, the more I study the pics, the more gen this dial looks. This 1 could turn out to be another record-breaking sale. Maybe not quite as high as Dowling's DR's $18.5k (because the seller does not have Dowling's name & esteem), but I will bet it ends up close (+/-) & will be purchased with similar intentions (to convert a less rare 5513 over to a VERY rare 5514 along with a gen or Vietnamese caseback). __________ Update 2 -- Maybe not...... Here is a gen 5514 for comparison And a better picture of another gen Comex that shows the gloss black paint better

If you mean Honpo, you might suggest that he improve his customer service skills & contact the Admin to discuss his becoming a collector here. With roughly 13,000 rep buyers currently on board, it would be to everyone's benefit were he to make his wares available (on a reliable basis) to RWG members. I know I would be 1 of the 1st in line to purchase 1 of his 7750-powered asymmetrical 6239 Daytonas (pics on 1st page of this thread).

Opinions (here & on TZ) appear to be very mixed on this model, but the waiting lists at many ADs are already beginning to approach Daytona-like in their numbers (& expected wait times). I already have a space reserved in 1 of my cases for a decent rep of the SDDS to gather dust in.

Pics borrowed from you know where

Where is the 'news' here? So CH is finally joining the rest of the modern world & starting to treat contraband like contraband. But taken in the context of increased inspections of imported reps by UK & US customs & recent law suits brought against ebay by Rolex, Tiffany & other gen makers, I, again, warn that the gen brands are (or will soon be) setting their targets on us -- individuals & websites that cater to the sale & manufacture (or remanufacture) of trademarked goods. And with RWG being so prominently listed in google, I fear it is just a matter of time. So be circumspect in what you post. Best not to post names or locations as these can all be used by ambulance chasers (lawyers) to 'connect the dots'.

Just another beater day for me By the way, the current (August) issue of Watchtime has nice features on IWC & the new Milgauss

I agree with the above. If the dial is gen (most I see advertised as gen are in fact either new aftermarket or redials of aftermarket dials), I would give the seller cash before his drugs wear off.

This DRSD (with working Hev) is all gen except for the dial (soon to be replaced), crystal (Clarks), pearl (Ofrei), case (modded MBW) & hands (Clarks). The bracelet, from end link to end link, is all gen. The drive train is all gen.

I thought this had been confirmed long ago. But glad to see that I am not alone.

You are a brave man.

Perry - sorry to hear this. Excuse me if this is old news, but have you tried running both the hour hand & time-settings through a full 24 hour cycle to see if that 'resets' your movement? A few other owners have reported success with this procedure. I know this is not a permanent or reliable fix, or even a reasonable option for such an expensive watch, but if it will allow you to keep the watch on your wrist instead of in the shipping lanes, it may be a good alternative.

You have the minimum required to remove the movement from the case. There are alot of disassembly guides that you should read. But these are the basic steps -- Set the hands to a position that is out of the way of the loose marker and leave the stem in the hand-setting position. Remove the bracelet. Remove the caseback. Use the red handled screwdriver (120) to press the stem release tab & remove the stem. Remove the 2 movement screws & locking tabs that hold the movement in the case (put all of the removed parts in a small glass or shallow plate so you do not lose them). Place some lint free paper on top of the loose movement & gently turn the case over to remove the movement. Be careful not to bump the hands during removal. Once removed, a small of carefully applied glue or clear nail polish to the backside of the marker should keep it in place. Just be careful to apply a minute amount & factor in the space needed for the glue to spread when you apply it (apply less than you think you may need). Once you have the marker glued back into place, place an upside down wine glass on top of the movement for 24 hours (or an hour if you used nail polish) so the glue can fully dry. Reverse the removal process to reassemble.