Thanks guys for the feedback! No, can't blame the question on narcotics or other substances
Know it's one of the golden rule of gen dials to always avoid refinishing if not totally beaten up (another gold rule being not to snip off dial feet). To the story however goes that the dial at the same price as say an NDT. The seller insisted on having it sent over to Michael Young. which I kindly turned down - to get some time to gather thoughts and review options. When I got the dial I was however surprised how much I liked it as-is.
Although this, I just don't know if that missing marker at 4 will be irritating and taking focus from the rest of the watch. On the other hand, if relumed - will I spend most of my days regretting that the original lume is gone forever..?
And yes dbane - case should look familiar to you and a crew of other guys here
Really like it, would say that you're just about as close as it gets if we're talking "lume" mixture (color, texture). Lovely picture of the hands too! When it comes to the dial, I'd say what remains for perfection is just practice and more practice to get the indice shape 100% (circles, rectangles and triangle). Just my uneducated 5 cents
That looks really good! Could you describe how it was assembled (if dial was laser welded to the inner ring or not etc)?
I'm asking as I've (or Pbdad to be honest) had some issues getting it all together...
Very very impressive Akira! You've come a very long way. As others have pointed out, color is spot on. There's quite some variation I'd say regarding how the degradation has affected texture, some spongy - some not and more dry/matte.
Regarding shape, my understanding is that gilt dials and earlier matte dials had more rounded shapes, later ones having flat appearance.
Bart dial:
Malteser plots matte:
Spongy:
The thread was started by Rolexfinder, none other, late December 2013 and is currently bumped in the straps sales section. Am I misunderstanding something?