I would tend to agree on thw women it is a different story though, as it expected they are smaller. They also where all sorts of large braclets etc. Now if a skiiny guy with 6in wrist wears it looks wrong .
Big Gun "LOL.
I think you really want Andrew to give you things that fit in places that they shouldnt"
Now that was uncalled for, inter-net tough I gather.
lalalobster,
Beautiful watch, good review. Not an accuracy junky myself quality of piece how it wears are my thing (like you wouldn't know anyway nor would anyone around my area). I will need something for one of my sons (bday) and due to wrist size was looking for a good fit on a smaller wrist (no offense), this fits the bill.
Hard to tell how well they pulled it off, often only when dealers have generic QC pics under their shots do I get a true
read on a watch. Unfortunately none yet.
Good call tomhorn that looks nice for 6in wrist. Must say the chrono grabs me more but you have to wear what works for you.
rwgforumfan I have the reverse problem with huge wrist plenty of watches I LOVE but can not wear.
14.7 in thickness, I don't know. At 42 dial not massive at all but with 50mm w/ lugs............ That extra .75 in. tomhorn has may just make the difference. Very nice looking by the way, your call.
Crap dutch do you have one need to know IWC deployment size for end of strap for my strap guy, dealers tend to just not get it right.
Gavin how about a number from your deployment?
Thickness counts, although the shots do look good on the guys with around your size I think you might find it chunky.
At about 8.75in I can wear anything (except small like Rolex) & still find anything over 15mm just does not sit right.