markiemark

i think it's H

Nice piece mate! Wear her in good health!

There is no (decent) rep of that model with the power reserve...

Im confused. What exactly do you want? You showed a PAM375 and asked what model it is, I answered it's the PAM375, and now you show a different one...

375

Will you be offering the TC YM anytime soon???? :D

STUNNING! Here some real life pics: http://www.ablogtowatch.com/iwc-aquatimer-chronograph-charles-darwin-watch-bronze-hands/

In London for the weekend...

6 looks good for a G-series as well as the non-squared CG corners, but the position of the CG pin worries me...

I hope you didnt... Why? Well that means that you f#cked over one of our TD's. I'm not sure if it applies to RWG as well, but on other forums you will get banned for that kind of jokes!

That looks good A! Really good!

New shoes!

This is indeed a great out of the box rep! Quality-wise its about the same, top Noob quality. But TC's QC is better because he assembles the watch and checks every part himself. Some SD's have crooked markers at 6, misaligned dates and rehaut engravings etc. But we have QC pics for that to address those things... When it comes to the 'feel', that's quite difficult to say, because they are both complete different watches. Long story short, a great watch, a great rep, with great quality!

For quite some time I owned a TC sub (16610), but as I am used to wear 44mm PAM's the Sub became a bit small to me. So I started looking at the SubC (116610). I liked the more bulky look on the SubC's due to the larger dial indices, the thicker lugs, the larger CG's, etc. But for some reason it looked too rectangular to me. So when the v2 of the Seadweller (SD4000) (116600) from Noob came out I was quite happy! The lugs of the SD4000 are slimmer, and the CG's are more tapered than the SubC's. That brings it closer to the more classic look of the older model(s). The SD4000 is about 2.5mm thicker than the SubC (without measuring the cyclops), this is because of the thicker case on the SD4000 and its raised crystal. The insert looks more balanced because the indices on the SubC's insert are mostly between 12 and 3 o'clock, where the insert of the SD4000 has them all around. At first this looks more busy, but at the end more balanced. The no-cyclops finishes the clean look. At first I missed it because it is part of the Rolex look, but not having a cyclops looks pretty cool actually. What about the raised crystal? Well, that is just bad-a$$! On to some pics then! Well aligned engravings in the rehaut, and the nice raised crystal. Date aligned and centered? Check! And a nice SEL fitment too. The SEL is nice and tight and a bit raised like gen. Well done Noob! Helium valve. Nothing special, has the correct color. The clasp is nicely finished and closing it gives a nice and tight snap. Lume shot later at night. An earlier wristie to show the dial is indeed matte, in certain light conditions and angles. Very nice! I didn't take any pics of the bracelet. But I have to say that the screws are tight, REALLY tight. I messed up one screw and scratched one link whilst trying to remove it. The bracelet was really really stiff. First I had it in a soap bath for about 30 minutes and then a WD40 bath for the night. This helped a lot! Now it is silky smooth and very comfortable. I also removed the diver extension, which made it more comfortable on the wrist.

the 390

I always ship with PostNL, most of my packages are around 240 gr...

Sunny Sunday!

at least he did a search lol

Thanks!

You have one of the nicest 127's out there mate! A true stunner

TC has the "classic" aka 16610, you have the "modern" sub aka 116610 This looks to me as a Noob v5, and a nice sample too!

Wow that looks awesome! Oh and what is the name and maker of the strap? That combo is a killer!