Tribal Posted January 21, 2010 Report Share Posted January 21, 2010 Hello Gang, Puretime has now released the SD 1665 in a lot of variations. There is also a Comex No date Sub with a SD Case that is wrong. The great white has the wrong Caseback also. But all in all they look good I think. Look here. http://puretimewatch.com/index.php?categoryID=306&offset=210 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tribal Posted January 21, 2010 Author Report Share Posted January 21, 2010 I also noticed that the Comex 1665 has also a wrong Caseback. They must update this also. Would love to see Bezel assembly on this ones. But for 198 USD it's a really good deal in my opinion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
asciwhite Posted January 21, 2010 Report Share Posted January 21, 2010 Im gonna get one for sure! But I am confused by the dials. So many to choose from. I am probably getting one of the DRSD But what dial. Anyone point me in the direction of some info about the different ones? @ doubleredseadweller there is a list but is the numbers of the dials corresponding with the numbers given by PT?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
athan Posted January 21, 2010 Report Share Posted January 21, 2010 Also the great white dial is wrong with font types and fonts alignment being way off. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alligoat Posted January 21, 2010 Report Share Posted January 21, 2010 What the heck, I ordered a GWSD. I guess I could always put a Yuki dial in there if it bothers me. But this watch already has $300 worth of mods so I'm money ahead! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mickey Padge Posted January 21, 2010 Report Share Posted January 21, 2010 The GWSD has a poor dial, yes, never mind..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coolfire Posted January 21, 2010 Report Share Posted January 21, 2010 Very tempted too! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1watching2 Posted January 21, 2010 Report Share Posted January 21, 2010 yes, which dial/package is the most accurate? I would love this to be my first vintage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
asciwhite Posted January 21, 2010 Report Share Posted January 21, 2010 Ordered myself a DRSD dial 2 option This is gonna be exiting Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FxrAndy Posted January 21, 2010 Report Share Posted January 21, 2010 And they will have the correct beat out of the box also Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coolfire Posted January 21, 2010 Report Share Posted January 21, 2010 And they will have the correct beat out of the box also Yep, That, imho, is vital for a vintage rollie. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
freddy333 Posted January 21, 2010 Report Share Posted January 21, 2010 I am a bit less whelmed than the rest of you. The cases all look like the same fare we have been getting from other dealers & the dials all leave much to be desired. The 5514, the best of the bunch in my opinion, looks like they got the Comex font nearly right (& it may even be painted, which is even better). But, then, the lume color is hideous & all of the hour markers are misaligned. In fact, looking at it again, even the white Comex block was printed at an angle All in all, I am not sure what all the excitement is about? Feh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kbh Posted January 21, 2010 Report Share Posted January 21, 2010 Hope the whole batch isn't printed like that. Could just be one bad dial. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1watching2 Posted January 21, 2010 Report Share Posted January 21, 2010 (edited) from that pic, looks like the hour markers don't align with the hash marks around the outside of the dial. Looks like a rush job? version 2 does align better Edited January 21, 2010 by 1watching2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest HaloArchive Posted January 21, 2010 Report Share Posted January 21, 2010 Dial 2 is the best one. All of the other ones, the crown is screwed up and, the L aligns best under the cornet on #2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
andygt Posted January 21, 2010 Report Share Posted January 21, 2010 I think the markers being off may just be an optical trick - viewing these dials from the front it looks like they line up ok: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
asciwhite Posted January 21, 2010 Report Share Posted January 21, 2010 I am happy I choose the #2 dial... Imho it looks good But the #3 is not bad either.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slickdick Posted January 21, 2010 Report Share Posted January 21, 2010 (edited) IMO dial #2 has too bold print. Each of the 3 dials above use different font, different minute track.... Edited January 21, 2010 by slickdick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mojako Posted January 21, 2010 Report Share Posted January 21, 2010 What version is the best to swap in a Tudor snowflake dial? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
asciwhite Posted January 21, 2010 Report Share Posted January 21, 2010 All of them need CG mods. However thats easy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
panerai153 Posted January 21, 2010 Report Share Posted January 21, 2010 I would like one of these, but I think I'm going to wait fror version V5.11111 in about 6 months!. It seems like every rep is coming from the dealers with problems, that are then solved, but on an incrimental basis. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mickey Padge Posted January 21, 2010 Report Share Posted January 21, 2010 The thick rehaut "step" is missing too, MBW vintage Rolex watches have that, as the genuines do, these do not.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
slickdick Posted January 21, 2010 Report Share Posted January 21, 2010 The thick rehaut "step" is missing too, MBW vintage Rolex watches have that, as the genuines do, these do not.... Good point, most likely the bezel construction isn't like the gen, else a pic would have showed it off. Nevertheless price/product- wise it beats the cartel version. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tribal Posted January 21, 2010 Author Report Share Posted January 21, 2010 You are allright for the flaws,but anyway it's a good Deal. On a MBW there are much Mods and money involved to get it right. You must it see as a base watch. For the money we got a slow beat movement and the bracelet and endlinks looks also good. Must see the Case and bezel construction in flesh. Maybe the Lugs don't need to drilled. When I hve some cash I will order one an d make a comparsion Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
freddy333 Posted January 21, 2010 Report Share Posted January 21, 2010 This watch/dial is, by far, the best of the bunch & it still looks wrong (but I do like the insert). In my opinion, this watch would move into the acceptable range if retrofitted with a better handset (these hands all look fake, fake, fake) & if Ziggy relumed the dial with less obviously fake lume. Still, all in all, I think you would be better off with an out-of-the-box MBW. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now