Paneraibob Posted January 23, 2012 Report Posted January 23, 2012 Just take a look at toros pics http://repgeek.com/showthread.php?t=161963
Star69 Posted January 23, 2012 Report Posted January 23, 2012 Just take a look at toros pics http://repgeek.com/s...ad.php?t=161963 can you post them here ? thx Frank
Paneraibob Posted January 23, 2012 Report Posted January 23, 2012 can you post them here ? thx Frank SURE From his sales section from repgeek Rolex Sea Dweller 40mm, SS case, bracelet, sapphire glass, Superlumed $238 Asian ETA 2836 $308 Swiss ETA 2836 + shipment
Star69 Posted January 23, 2012 Report Posted January 23, 2012 (edited) thanks !! no straight front shot can not see the rehaut could be a nice beater edit : Josh has pics up - rehaut looks good ! Edited January 23, 2012 by Star69
z3k0 Posted January 23, 2012 Report Posted January 23, 2012 But, crown still sits too low on case, doesn't it ?
thogaa Posted January 23, 2012 Report Posted January 23, 2012 thanks !! no straight front shot can not see the rehaut could be a nice beater edit : Josh has pics up - rehaut looks good ! I'd hit it
Star69 Posted January 23, 2012 Report Posted January 23, 2012 But, crown still sits too low on case, doesn't it ? yes - litle too low - on Joshs pics it look better - i whould install a gen crown + better insert and shave the CGs ... i wait till i see some member pics - then i guess i have to order one
Tribal Posted January 23, 2012 Report Posted January 23, 2012 yes - litle too low - on Joshs pics it look better - i whould install a gen crown + better insert and shave the CGs ... i wait till i see some member pics - then i guess i have to order one 100% agreed.
Tribal Posted January 23, 2012 Report Posted January 23, 2012 doubt this has a gen like bezel construction despite the description For shure not!!!
thogaa Posted January 23, 2012 Report Posted January 23, 2012 For shure not!!! Does it matter if gen insert fits?
its_urabus Posted January 23, 2012 Report Posted January 23, 2012 A gen pearl is needed. I gen insert would be better as it is a different dimension than say the 16610. To buy I would need a wearable bracelet, that one sucks. Sel construction is weird. The crown position is low enough that it looks wrong. A gen crown would totally be needed. I was very excited when the said this was coming out and it was a 1:1 special project. In my eyes they failed.
cib0rgman Posted January 23, 2012 Report Posted January 23, 2012 I'd hit it if you compare this picture and the other ones, quality pictures clearly can see that is not he same watch, the rehaut looks woky
thogaa Posted January 23, 2012 Report Posted January 23, 2012 if you compare this picture and the other ones, quality pictures clearly can see that is not he same watch, the rehaut looks woky I don't think the QC pics are updated yet
duke1973 Posted January 23, 2012 Report Posted January 23, 2012 I don't think the QC pics are updated yet I sure hope they update the old QC pics and it does look like the "new" watch.....
watcher Posted January 23, 2012 Author Report Posted January 23, 2012 I have ordered one. If I get QC pics I'll post them. I already have a gen SD insert and crown and a bracelet with better SEL's so it will make a decent daily beater if nothing else!
thogaa Posted January 23, 2012 Report Posted January 23, 2012 QC pics are updated on Josh's site: http://imgur.com/a/tJd3J This is actually my watch
watcher Posted January 23, 2012 Author Report Posted January 23, 2012 (edited) WM9 SD pics! This is the gen they reckoned to buy to do the replication! The rehaut looks very good in QC pics. Bracelet aside this is a reasonable effort to be honest and very workable. Actually I have just looked at the pic and the CG's do look very stubby! I would ask for better pics to be sure! Edited January 23, 2012 by watcher
Star69 Posted January 23, 2012 Report Posted January 23, 2012 i hope the crown is ultrahuge - but i dont think the CGs can be fixed - they are way too short - it may work with an 5513 that "could" have been polished over and over - but for the SD ?
watcher Posted January 23, 2012 Author Report Posted January 23, 2012 one other flaw I notice in QC pic is 93250 stamped on the bracelet end link. Should it not read 93160.
duke1973 Posted January 23, 2012 Report Posted January 23, 2012 Those CG's look way too short and stubby.
ispytonyv Posted January 23, 2012 Report Posted January 23, 2012 yeah shame about the CGs, because the rehaut really does look improved
StormTooper4 Posted January 24, 2012 Report Posted January 24, 2012 what happened with the CGs ? MIA ? Yikes
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now