agfa421 Posted August 4, 2012 Report Share Posted August 4, 2012 Hey folks, just found on perfect clones this new version of the SubNoDate 114060: http://www.1-pc8838.com/rlss00029-114060-2012-nodate-p-12478.html you have to click twice on the link so it'll work. what do you think of this watch? Thx! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
highoeyazmuhudee Posted August 5, 2012 Report Share Posted August 5, 2012 sweet! was wondering when they were gonna build thsi thing! only modern Rolex C im interested in. 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PeteM Posted August 5, 2012 Report Share Posted August 5, 2012 I noticed this too..... I aint got a clue about how good it is .... but it looks decent... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ephry73 Posted August 5, 2012 Report Share Posted August 5, 2012 Depending on how good the dial is this can be used to make a 14060m with the COSC print. Change out the markers and use different hands. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jackjo Posted August 5, 2012 Report Share Posted August 5, 2012 I am interested to see how the ceramic insert looks in person. In the pictures it looks much flatter than the slanted ceramic inserts of the past. This would be a big bonus. Rehuat looks a little too sloped but I ordered one just to see how it looks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Librarian Posted August 6, 2012 Report Share Posted August 6, 2012 Just got the email from Andrew about this. Very interesting. If anyone could post real world pics it would be appreciated. Could this get my Pam 040 off my wrist? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dutchguy2 Posted August 6, 2012 Report Share Posted August 6, 2012 Here is the real deal And here is the clone, Looks funny to me, specially the bezel. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
highoeyazmuhudee Posted August 6, 2012 Report Share Posted August 6, 2012 its too wokky! i was thinking they were just gonna be using existing 116610 rep cases with this dial. guess not. any one wanna build a fantasy maxi dial 14060? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smab Posted August 17, 2012 Report Share Posted August 17, 2012 Hi to all! The caseshape is not true to the gen, at least as far as I can tell from the pictures. They still have too narrow CG tips compared to GEN (CG tips should be winder on the edges, compared to GEN). Also, it looks they still have too narrow lug tips. Lugs on GEN looks fatter, and the overall look of the GEN case looks more square, and protrude. As far as I am conserned, they have used the same caseshape as with the Sub-C date, which they made, disecting a GMT-Master II ceramic. It will all be wrong, wrong, wrong! If you look at the pics on Rolex site, compare case shape GMT-M II C and SUB-C, you will notice, the CG-tips on the GMT-M II C are more looking like the CG tips of the rep SUB no-date. So in overall, the CG shape is wrong. The shape of the CG for SUB-C is more straight out of the case and makes not so narrow CG tips, whereas the shape of the GMT-M II C CG is more angeled downwards out of the case, making the tip of the CG (where it ends on each side of the crown) more narrow. If you understand what I try to explain, please comment, pro or con? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RBT1680 Posted August 17, 2012 Report Share Posted August 17, 2012 I can't resist any longer. What is the definition of Wokky? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robaer Posted August 17, 2012 Report Share Posted August 17, 2012 The rehaut is in the shape of an inverted cone, similar to a wok pan. On the gen sub the rehaut is much straighter from the crystal to the dial. There is a noob factory version of the no date sub c which looks better imho, but still not perfect. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
seafoam Posted August 18, 2012 Report Share Posted August 18, 2012 One word: Terrible! The ceramic insert looks like it has yellow markers? WTF. Hopefully looks better in person... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Inertiadrifter Posted August 18, 2012 Report Share Posted August 18, 2012 The one in puretime looks way better Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jmb Posted August 19, 2012 Report Share Posted August 19, 2012 any one wanna build a fantasy maxi dial 14060? The only 14060 dials I can get now are the Maxis and I have a few if you need one... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobDog Posted August 19, 2012 Report Share Posted August 19, 2012 Big flaw is the dial wording: OFFICIALLYCERTIFIED all one word! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Smab Posted August 21, 2012 Report Share Posted August 21, 2012 Holy mother of crap! It is really bad, and on some of the pics it looks like yellow markers on the bezel, as some of you state. On the dealers site, they clearly state that the ceramic sub was made by disecting a GMT-Master II ceramic, since they have the same case shape. That is not the case (same;-) The case is not the same, just take a look at the SUBS and the GMT's on the Rolex website. You see the shape of the crownguards are not the same. I do not understand why I did not see this flaw until recently. Guess one gets more and more overanalytic when time goes by, and one flaw after the other comes aparent. Can someone of you tell me 1 rep of a Rolex that has a true 1:1 case shape and dimensions? Not the Subs anyways. Still they have not managed to get the hour markers and pearl near look-alike to the GENS. How difficult can it be? Same situation with the DSSD. Wrong hour markers and pearl, also HE valve is not recessed, as on the GEN. Bracelet is not on-par by any means with the quality one should expect at 400 + USD. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ephry73 Posted August 21, 2012 Report Share Posted August 21, 2012 I actually saw a gen one in St Maarten last week and kinda liked the simple dial and overall feel of the watch. The weight is pretty much up to par with the Sub-C. The factory just needs to get the dial correct and should be a popular seller. E Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
seraphe Posted August 22, 2012 Report Share Posted August 22, 2012 (edited) Definition of 'wokky'... refer to pic. Compared to PT's noob version, the rehaut are not cylindrical (straight down) like it should be. You can see it more clearly with the QC pics from the two. Having said this, we're not to say noob's version has no flaw. The obvious ones include the wrong fat hands, the curved top triangle and thin bezel markers. Edited August 22, 2012 by seraphe Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Archetypal Posted January 7, 2013 Report Share Posted January 7, 2013 Theres a discussion going on about the BP 114060 from Trusty, the watch has been updated.http://www.rwgforum.net/topic/154790-trustys-ceramic-black-submariner-arrived-wow/ Anyone know if the 114060 has had an update too? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Archetypal Posted January 7, 2013 Report Share Posted January 7, 2013 Ive answered my own question by speaking to Andrew, the 114060 is updated, and potentially looks better than noob. Might order one and compare. Anyone already got one? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
6now Posted January 9, 2013 Report Share Posted January 9, 2013 Link to the updated version? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Archetypal Posted January 9, 2013 Report Share Posted January 9, 2013 Its on the trusty website, but as mentioned the photos have not been updated. BP have updated their entire Rolex range by the looks of things. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Archetypal Posted January 10, 2013 Report Share Posted January 10, 2013 Here it is with updated photos from Josh: http://www.1-pc8838.com/rlss00029-114060-2012-nodate-p-13290.html You get exactly the same updated watch from Andrew here: http://www.ttw168.com/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath=1_7&products_id=9694 Anyone got this or planning to buy? Case set looks finally like it may be inline with the Gen on this latest BP factory effort. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronin Posted January 12, 2013 Report Share Posted January 12, 2013 Craptastic. Until OFICIALLYCERTIFIED gains a space and the Wok is reduced this is not worth $50. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
seafoam Posted January 14, 2013 Report Share Posted January 14, 2013 Here it is with updated photos from Josh: http://www.1-pc8838.com/rlss00029-114060-2012-nodate-p-13290.html You get exactly the same updated watch from Andrew here: http://www.ttw168.com/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath=1_7&products_id=9694 Anyone got this or planning to buy? Case set looks finally like it may be inline with the Gen on this latest BP factory effort. Those are 2 totally different watches. The latter is terrible! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.