Not a datejust expert, but does this look gen?

[madmole]

Friend of mine has just been offered this at £3400 from a jewellers

 

But rehaut letters looks shifted, date mag looks low, date high and font not so good to me. But I dont know this model at all.Bracelet has a hidden clasp not the normal oyster

 

 

Any comments?

 

Thanks
 

 

Stephen

[alligoat]

That's a Ladies model, right? That would explain the thick date font. What year is it?

[sputim]

Not an expert either but as stated date alignement looks definitely odd...

[kbh]

Seems way over priced to me.

[lionsandtigers]

looks fishy. date font is too fat. the seconds hand should end at the outer minute track

[FROGMAN]

Looks gen....but damn that's pricey

[madmole]

Yes, ladies model

Don't know year I'm afraid, friend said jewellers said newish. Not current though

[lionsandtigers]

Again not gen. Tell your friend to pass

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[alligoat]

OK, it's a lady's model. That being said, I'd doubt a reputable jeweler would be trying to pass off a rep for that price, which by the way is a bit high IMO.

[madmole]

Thanks for all your help guys. She has passed up on it

 

In fact she bought a Christopher Ward Coral Ladies instead for a 20th of the price

 

S

[lionsandtigers]

Guess I could be wrong but that seconds hand is ahort

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[madmole]

I've found a pic of a 3 year old genuine thats a good match hand length and font size. Still a dodgy rehaut and date alignment. Its been rejected

[mymanmatt]

Now that I can see the date font, I'd say gen ladies

[Omega]

100% gen. But it's overpriced...

Gesendet von meinem iPhone mit Tapatalk

[mymanmatt]

Overpriced for sure. However, it seems the best price on rolex, is in the USA. Every place else in the world they much higher

[stratcat]

I don't like the way the date is top justified. I don't think it's gen.

[grew]

Its a gen ladies watch. Its just overpriced