freddy333

Good find, Alligoat. I still have reservations, but the seller does have a good track record of selling Rolex, so maybe it is gen.

The area Rolex rep was in the store & she was showing all 3 of the new Milgauss models (the 2 green anniversarys were already pre-sold so I was unable to try 1 on, but I did see it on the rep's wrist). Under the store lights, it was VERY green. I actually thought the green crystal, on its own, was kind of cool. But having the green crystal fitted to that overdone dial & blingy case made the watch look like cheap, costume jewelry. Not at all to my taste. But to be fair, I do not like most of the modern models, which is why my collecting is centered around vintage pieces. But now that the initial newness has begun to wear off, I have been noticing a definite cooling off of interest for the new Milgauss models on TZ as well. So it may not just be me.

Been awhile since that beauty graced RWG's pages. More please.

That is what I thought until I saw it in person. But I can understand why it offends alot of people (I used to be 1 of them).

Oddly, I am probably 1 of the few vintage (steel) fans who consider the new Yachtmaster 2 (in yellow gold, no less) to be a pretty striking piece of watch machinery (if you are unfamiliar with the YM2's technical feats, I would encourage you to go to rolex.com & read about it) Of course, I would never be caught dead wearing such a flamboyant watch (I actually find it less objectionable than the original YM with its raised bezel lettering), but it is definitely the kind of thing I might hide in the back of my watch box & ogle (as opposed to google) on cold, winter nights.

What kind of solution are you using in the ultrasonic?

Ziggy is right -- either brake issue or the chrono hand has become loosened on its tube (a very common problem). If the hand resets to a different position every time you reset it, the hand is probably loose. You need to remove the hand (I would do all 3 chrono hands at the same time since they are probably also loose) & apply a tiny speck of cement (I use a slow-dry metal epoxy). If the brake is the problem, this may be helpful.

Ziggy -- the problem with this approach is that the auto-winder may not fully charge the mainspring if the owner happens to be a desk jockey (like me). I do not think that tapping on a keyboard for most of the day provides a sufficient amount of movement, which is why some of our watches need a bit of supplemental assistance in the form of hand-winding. But, in my case at least, I know that my winding gears are properly lubed, which may not be the case for other manual winders.

I agree. This is an area that I partially disagree with Ziggy on. As long as the watch is in good condition & you wind gently (and slowly), manual winding should not damage anything. I have a couple of A7750s that have been manually wound at least weekly (1 of these is my secs at 6 Daytona) for the past few years without any ill effects -- the gears are clean with no visibly worn teeth & the auto-wind module winds the mainspring without any problems.

I just replaced the same gear (with the same problem) in a friend's watch yesterday (he has been warned many times NOT to force the crown if it becomes difficult to turn). So I think Ziggy's warning bears repeating -- IF you note any resistance or find it hard to handwind, STOP, or your going to damage the movement.

Sounds like you have no other options, unless you want to spend a few weeks searching ebay or TZ's sales forum. But your watchmaker may not want to have your watch sitting there while you search.

Beater as usual But dvn's entry makes me pine for this (maybe tomorrow)

If a seller or site is not listed in the Watch Collector Galleries section of this site (access to some sections of RWG requires an upgrade of your member status to 'Supporter'), it is either unreliable or unknown (unknown = unreliable until proven otherwise). Based on the descriptions of some of their watches (like this 'automatic' Lange Grand Arkade (which I can see is clearly a manual movement in the pictures)), I would consider this site very risky. If you do purchase anything, I would use a credit card & check with your bank (before clicking the BUY button) to be sure they will allow you to cancel payment should the transaction turn out to be less than satisfactory.

TTK is infamous for ignoring inquiries when he feels the answers are obvious (to TTK). In this case, he is probably ignoring all the squeaky wheels while he is busy testing their collective watches. Not the way I would treat paying customers, but TTK has his own way of doing business and, to be fair, he always comes through with the goods.

I always love a Movado on a woman's wrist. Perfect combination of glitz, class & mystery. Nice look, Vic.

Wow! I consider everything else posted in this thread hereby & officially trumped, and trumped good & well. :wub:

Initially, I hated this watch. Then, after seeing a few well-photographed samples pop up on TZ, it started to grow on me.......at least enough to encourage me to take a trip to an AD to see 1 in the flesh. But as soon as I put it on my wrist, any & all attraction vanished. Orange & green with big, honking index markers.......yuck. And putting that lightning bolt hand on this circus watch just makes things worse. Overall, the impression it left on me was even worse than the LV (which was not good). I think this model will become Rolex's next Edsel -- a great idea (to reissue the classic Milgauss) that was executed poorly (redesigning a classic to appeal to the blingy crowd instead of updating the original to maintain its classic appeal).

Mickey -- For the most part, my Rolex interests lie in vintage models, so take this with a grain of salt...........but your watch looks correct to me. Without seeing what you started with, I cannot itemize what you had replaced or modded, but if I saw this watch worn by someone (credible) on the street, it would certainly fool me & I suspect any average Rolex owner. Wear it well.

These & most of the 'repainted' dials sold by NDtrading & other dial vendors are not in fact redials at all. What they are are new aftermarket dials being marketed as 'repainted' to give them some degree of authenticity, which they do not deserve.

Actually, on 2nd look the 2nd dial looks like an NDtrading piece that may have been relumed, which is what threw me the 1st time. So they are all probably fakes, with the 2nd 1 being the least objectionable.

2 may be the real deal. Hard to tell from the pictures.

Definite spam trap. Give them an email address & they will give you spam. And for anyone who is interested -> freerolexreport.com internet address = 74.208.94.26 origin = ns57.1and1.com mail addr = hostmaster@1and1.com internet address = 74.208.94.26 mail exchanger = mx00.1and1.com nameserver = ns58.1and1.com nameserver = ns57.1and1.com --- performing WHOIS on "74.208.94.26", please wait... --- contacting server whois.arin.net --- smart whois on "74.208.94" OrgName: 1&1 Internet Inc. OrgID: 11INT Address: 701 Lee Rd Address: Suite 300 City: Chesterbrook StateProv: PA PostalCode: 19087 Country: US NetRange: 74.208.0.0 - 74.208.111.255 CIDR: 74.208.0.0/18, 74.208.64.0/19, 74.208.96.0/20 NetName: 1AN1-NETWORK NetHandle: NET-74-208-0-0-1 Parent: NET-74-0-0-0-0 NetType: Direct Allocation NameServer: NSA.1AND1.COM NameServer: NSA2.1AND1.COM Comment: For abuse issues, please use only abuse@1and1.com RegDate: 2006-11-22 Updated: 2007-09-14 RAbuseHandle: 1AD-ARIN RAbuseName: 1and1 Abuse Department RAbusePhone: +1-877-206-4253 RAbuseEmail: abuse@1and1.com RNOCHandle: 1NO-ARIN RNOCName: 1and1 Network Operations RNOCPhone: +1-610-560-1617 RNOCEmail: arin-role@schlund.de RTechHandle: 1NO-ARIN RTechName: 1and1 Network Operations RTechPhone: +1-610-560-1617 RTechEmail: arin-role@schlund.de OrgTechHandle: 1NO-ARIN OrgTechName: 1and1 Network Operations OrgTechPhone: +1-610-560-1617 OrgTechEmail: arin-role@schlund.de

Just tried 1 of these on the other day & very nearly bit the bullet. Very nice watch. Nothing PMWF about it. Hamilton is 1 of the few reasonably priced watch brands that nearly always make me do a double-take when I pass them in a shop window. Quality all the way.

Thank you (all). For whatever it is worth, the shot started out with my arm being used as the 'bar', but I was unable to keep the watches stable long enough to get a good, clear shot. So I switched to plan b & shot them hanging off my pole instead.

Always best to wear latex, but as long as your fingers are not dirty & the movement is held on the edges, it should be fine.