freddy333

The very last place you want your character questioned is when you are putting your money (and watch) on the line. If a car salesman was wearing a rep and told you to trust him, would you trust him? In this situation, I would wear a gen or no watch at all.

Dave -- I think it was just the 727 that ran at 21,600. This movement was fitted with a new balance and the beat was increased for greater precision. Previous 72x movements (including the 726) ran at 18,000.

Valjoux 72 & variants run at 18000bph.

I am not sure about that dial either (Rolex does not usually miss the mark when applying the tritium), but it looks like a great project and one of my favorite watches.

Sorry, I was going to add that the exact size for this bit is not that important since you are only countersinking and NOT drilling all the way through. The countersink is like a circular indentation around the actual hole where the tube sits so the crown can screw all the way down on the tube and fit to the case properly.

4.33mm

Nanuq -- For perspective, I paid just under $100 for a NOS, round 3s white 3035 datewheel for my 16014, so a silver wheel for only a bit more seems like a steal. Sorry to hear you were not the lucky one who ended up with it.

Laz -- If you are unable to source a replacement dial, you might check with Ziggy to see what he can do. In addition to being a great watchmaker, he is also an artist and he may have another option for you. I believe he is on holiday until next month though.

100% gen 16014 franken-just

Ditto - 11/64"

I usually reserve this comment for women, but I have to say 'Nice pair you have there!'

dvn - I prefer stainless steel, but that is definitely a beautiful watch. And the pictures are not bad either.

I think the 703 crown is deeper than the earlier 701 and someone said they had to file down the 703 tube to get the earlier crown to completely screw down. You might use the search feature to try to find that thread.

Thanks. Reshaping a few of the bent parts was a bit difficult (it takes a bit of ingenuity & alot of patience), but most of the work just takes tape & time. Even without tightening the loose parts, you can achieve 90% of the final appearance by polishing the polished parts with green rouge & a dremel and brushing the brushed parts with the Bergeon pad. Those two things produced the most noticeable improvements.

I am not worried about damaging the existing tube (if I am replacing it), but I am worried that the old tube may break off in the hole or that I may damage the case threads when removing the epoxied in tube. When I have used epoxy to glue in screws before (I used to rebuild motorcar engines), it was only used as a last resort, because the screw would often not be removable after that. At least not without damaging the threads or risking breaking the screw off in the hole. That is what I am worried about.

I thought of using epoxy, but what do you do when you need to replace the tube the next time? I still have to wonder what Rolex uses when they fit one of these splineless tubes? There must be a tool for that.

Probably not. Here is Connery's Sub from Goldfinger

You just gave me an idea -- A small tool like a micrometer that has expanding jaws used to measure the inside diameter of a cylinder or tube would do the trick. You would slide the jaws inside the tube, expand them until they press firmly against the inside walls of the tube and then screw the tube into the case. Once installed, you just collapse the jaws and remove the tool. If such a tool exists, that would do the trick perfectly. Now does anyone know of a source for such a device?

You may have enough parts to decorate a Christmas tree.

Trib -- I am not sure what to think about that stack, but it sure makes for an interesting picture.

TWS -- I agree with you about the problems with using a crown to install the tube. You cannot really screw the tube down properly with a crown, because either the crown will bottom on the case before the tube is fully tightened, or the tube will partly (or fully) unscrew when you unscrew the crown. And although I have been able to install a couple of Twinlocks with a rat tail file, the file has gouged (damaged) the inside of both tubes. So there has got to be a better way to install these splineless tubes since Rolex QC would never allow a watch to leave their premises with a damaged tube. Anyone else have any info on this?

Just wondering if there was a special tool or procedure Rolex used to remove & install these splineless tubes? I have both of the standard Rolex tube tools--1 for spines around the opening of the tube (new style) and 1 for splines around the inside of the tube (old style), but neither tool works with these splineless tubes (either the tool just spins freely inside the tube or it does not fit into the hole in the tube). I have to fit a couple of splineless 6mm Twinlocks and I would rather not have to choose between scratching/damaging the inside of the tube or relying on glue as the only options for keeping the tube in the case. I know we have all come up with different methods for R&Ring tubes (rat tail file, hex driver, etc.), but all of these run the risk of damaging the inside of the tube. I am sure RSC did not remove & install these tubes this way. They must have had a better way to do it. Is there any reference to the required tool or procedure in your documentation?

I do not consider a watch to be working unless it keeps proper time on my wrist. And, yes, the watch is working. The winder, on the other hand (no pun intended), although I have not tested it on my wrist, is definitely not working.

Hahaha, sorry.

Not so fast, my little timekeeping Grasshopper. The watch is fine, it is your winder that died (Sorry for poor picture quality - this is an enlargement from another picture) After 40 turns of the stem (by hand), the Daytona springs to life & the beat goes on