nwolf1716 Posted February 3, 2013 Report Posted February 3, 2013 It looks fantastic to me. You guys like it as much as i do?
sgtguk Posted February 3, 2013 Report Posted February 3, 2013 Not sure if it's the angle but the 6 marker looks off a tad, maybe just the light? Apart from that little thing this one looks awesome nice pearl too btw !
DMS Posted February 3, 2013 Report Posted February 3, 2013 Looking good to go! Awaiting my QC also...
Dovregubben Posted February 3, 2013 Report Posted February 3, 2013 Not sure if it's the angle but the 6 marker looks off a tad, maybe just the light? Apart from that little thing this one looks awesome nice pearl too btw ! I agree, but looks like both the 6 and the 9 marker is a bit crooked, but it may be the angle as you say. Otherwise it is great looking!
cougar1 Posted February 3, 2013 Report Posted February 3, 2013 Looks good to me mate, haven't seen much better than that, but I have seen worse 42mms in terms of lower pearl placement so I think you got a pretty good one. I'd say go for it. If the markers are a little crooked it is very minimal and should be an easy fix.
importr Posted February 3, 2013 Report Posted February 3, 2013 I thought my 42 was perfect. Then I saw the logo! Wtf!
Rolexman Posted February 3, 2013 Report Posted February 3, 2013 Then I saw the logo! You can't trust them for a second
sgtguk Posted February 3, 2013 Report Posted February 3, 2013 I thought my 42 was perfect. Then I saw the logo! Wtf! Which dealer is this form Importr ? Crazy having this logo around still
martijnp Posted February 3, 2013 Report Posted February 3, 2013 Watch looks good despite the logo! I would reject this watch mate..
Dovregubben Posted February 3, 2013 Report Posted February 3, 2013 As a newbie, what is happy feet? I´am also a noob, but i think i have got the understanding about the "happy feet" The happy feet is when the "toes" on the feet of the O-logo points upwards. On dials with printet logo, there should be happy feet, but when the logo is a metal insert as on the PO, the feet shold be straigt and not pointy. correct me if i´m wrong.
importr Posted February 3, 2013 Report Posted February 3, 2013 It's from Perfect Clones. At first I said it was ok. Then an hour or so later I realised and emailed back to ask for a replacement. He basically refused and said that because I initially said ok, it was as good as shipped. And that it wasn't happy feet, it was 'reflection'. I asked for another pic but he again refused. So much for loyalty & QC hey. I know where my future money isnt going that's for sure.
Dovregubben Posted February 3, 2013 Report Posted February 3, 2013 It's from Perfect Clones. At first I said it was ok. Then an hour or so later I realised and emailed back to ask for a replacement. He basically refused and said that because I initially said ok, it was as good as shipped. And that it wasn't happy feet, it was 'reflection'. I asked for another pic but he again refused. So much for loyalty & QC hey. I know where my future money isnt going that's for sure. Feel sorry for you, and it is noted about PC.. I certainly hope that it is reflection that mess up the O in the OMEGA, but the reflection does not create happy feet..
importr Posted February 3, 2013 Report Posted February 3, 2013 What pisses me off is that it costs him nothing to replace it. Yet it costs me or some other Dozy fu k 375 bucks
Dovregubben Posted February 3, 2013 Report Posted February 3, 2013 I have wondered a bit about this. I see in your situation, he probably can complain to the factory and get a new one. But for instance, i understand that at least some TD´s replace your order if it get´s confiscated by customs. I guess that is a loss the TD will have to take?
cougar1 Posted February 3, 2013 Report Posted February 3, 2013 (edited) It's from Perfect Clones. At first I said it was ok. Then an hour or so later I realised and emailed back to ask for a replacement. He basically refused and said that because I initially said ok, it was as good as shipped. And that it wasn't happy feet, it was 'reflection'. I asked for another pic but he again refused. So much for loyalty & QC hey. I know where my future money isnt going that's for sure. Fcuk, jesus that is not on, Importr, yours is the 2nd i've seen with clear happy feet, thought the first was a one off but yours too, hope this won't turn into a disaster but not the best signs. I think josh is being very unreasonable here, i'd very much doubt it shipped either but his loss in the long run and you remain [censored] off. I wouldn't deal with him either again if I was in your shoes. Ridiculous stuff. Edited February 3, 2013 by cougar1
cougar1 Posted February 3, 2013 Report Posted February 3, 2013 Also shame that the watch looks v.good with great pearl etc all except for that logo, one step forward two steps back with the factories again!???
importr Posted February 3, 2013 Report Posted February 3, 2013 Yeah the rest of the watch pleased me while I reviewed them while stupidly still half asleep. I even suggested the possibility of a logo mix up by the maker, but no, mistakes don't happen do they?! Josh has had thousands of bucks off me for the past 6+ years. Not a cent more now
Craig S Posted February 3, 2013 Report Posted February 3, 2013 Don't blame you mate. That watch is advertised as having "no happy feet" so if you ordered the item and it comes with happy feet, then it's not as advertised and not a fault. He should replace it without question. Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 2
SCAR.FACE Posted February 4, 2013 Report Posted February 4, 2013 Also shame that the watch looks v.good with great pearl etc all except for that logo, one step forward two steps back with the factories again!??? I wouldn't say two steps back because my QC photo have the correct Logo (no happy feets). Here are my QC pictures:
cougar1 Posted February 4, 2013 Report Posted February 4, 2013 Looks very good to me scarface, but the omega logo does looks a little tilted in the first pic, just slightly but it is tilted. It's a pity as the watch is one of the best so far I've seen. Whether you want to accept it with the tilted logo is up to you. You're right on the happy feet though, only a couple so far, but a good few tilted correct logos like yours are coming out. If it was me I'd accept and straighten the logo, but up to you.
importr Posted February 4, 2013 Report Posted February 4, 2013 Well I'm pleased to say that Joshua has replaced the happy feet PO with a correct one. I received new QC pics today. All is ok this time Phew! 4
cougar1 Posted February 4, 2013 Report Posted February 4, 2013 Yeah the rest of the watch pleased me while I reviewed them while stupidly still half asleep. I even suggested the possibility of a logo mix up by the maker, but no, mistakes don't happen do they?! Josh has had thousands of bucks off me for the past 6+ years. Not a cent more now Agree, seems not much loyalty these days, it's a shame but I'd do the same on principal. This whole release was a bit rushed, far too close to cny with no room for error, hundreds of orders went in yet any rejection meant the whole order would be stuck till after cny anyway. They should've waited until after cny and specified a bit better qc checking to the factory. I do hope most of this issues are in the minority but it doesn't exactly help your situation.Well I'm pleased to say that Joshua has replaced the happy feet PO with a correct one. I received new QC pics today. All is ok this time Phew! Excellent, good news, my previous post went in without reading this update. Glad you got sorted!
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now