Jump to content
When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.
  • Current Donation Goals

IWC Mark XVI


k2222

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 407
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I'd love one of these... so please keep us informed Karup :)

Who is Karup????? I'm Jakub or kuba :lol:

Ok time to wake up everybody!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! We need all infos needed about this watch:size, shape,pics etc!!! There is a chance, so go to work and post all info here, please avoid huge pics. Yeah!!!!!!!!!!!!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Who is Karup????? I'm Jakub or kuba :lol:

Oops... big bad typo :bangin:

Ok time to wake up everybody!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! We need all infos needed about this watch:size, shape,pics etc!!! There is a chance, so go to work and post all info here, please avoid huge pics. Yeah!!!!!!!!!!!!

So you're saying they are going to build something on data they want from us? I thought the new way of building a replica was to buy a genuine one and copy it. :blink:

Anyways... it's simple... go to www.iwc.ch and this is what you find:

- Inner case: soft iron for protection against magnetic fields

- Glass: sapphire, convex, antireflective, resistant against pressure drop

- Crown: screwed

- Water-resistant: 6 bar (60 m)

- Case diameter: 39 mm

- Case height: 11.5 mm

- Weight:

- Pilot's Watch Mark XVI in stainless steel with crocodile leather strap: 68 g

- Pilot's Watch Mark XVI in stainless steel with stainless steel bracelet: 122 g

And two beautifull pictures :wub:

post-188-1200155081_thumb.jpgpost-188-1200155090_thumb.jpg

The genuine will probably run on a ETA 2892-2 that is improved by IWC. So if they replicate this one they could use a chinese copy of the 2892.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

MARK XV was worn by Tom Cruise in Vanilla Sky:)))

Bad thing :p

and by Harrison Ford in Firewall :D

Great thing :lol:

I agree with Jarub, ooppss,,, soryy Jakub (Good job Yello :rolleyes: )

This watch should be reped.

Now, the problem with makers is that 95% of their business is probably made outside our forums.

And what are people looking at outside?

Not such a beauty, too classic, not noticable on the wrist as a "top" watch.

I would buy one right away if a rep was made.

@Jakub: I am not a specialist of IWC at all but I'm pretty sure some other member could give a lot of details about this watch.

As one said: let's make some noise.

I WANT ONE - I WANT ONE - I WANT ONE - I WANT ONE

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Easiest option would be to make the case a few milimeters thicker.

I don't know if there is a reliable asian movement with a similar thickness to the eta 2892 A2?

Best option would be of course to put the gen item in, but very expensive and hard to source...

I would be happy with a casekit without movement. That means correct case, crystal, dial and hands for eta 2892.

I would take care of the 2892 A2 myself, then.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Problem I see is that the eta 2824 is too thick. The genuine Mark XVI uses an eta 2892 A2, that is why it is only 11,5mm thick.

The lugsize is 20mm.

Yea. I think if this project done at all, it should be done correctly with a 2892A2 as the engine. Or an alternative would be the Selita SW 300.

But if it can't be 1:1, I would say don't bother.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.


×
×
  • Create New...
Please Sign In or Sign Up