Jump to content
When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.
  • Current Donation Goals

Any reviews of the newer 3135 superclone subs?


charlesdayton

Recommended Posts

From his web site:

This movement accepts gen dial and hands and you can put this movement into a gen case. When you adjust the time, the hands rotates in the same direction as you rotate the crown, same as genuine.

1:1 made from a genuine as sample, this is the final product and the movement is very stable and reliable, the fist real Rolex 3135 clone movement, do not miss your chance to be the first one own it!

RLX-2011-09-30-01-13_enl.jpg

Edited by kbh
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, the parts are interchangeable with the Asian ETA 2836-2, but not the stem. Also, the rotor and winding plate are a solid piece of metal, not a sticker. The [censored]'s arm is a funny one, one piece( I assume bolted to the top of the [censored]) and the adjusting arm is only revealed when you remove the auto-wind parts.

Pics below.

E

From left to right: ETA 2783, ETA 2824-2 and the 3135

DSC_0653-1.jpg

DSC_0654-1.jpg

DSC_0655-2.jpg

DSC_0658-2.jpg

Asian ETA 2836-2 and 3135 side by side without the auto-wind mechanism

DSC_06602.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you have the wrong movement there. Looks like you have the old '3135 look' movement thats been around for a couple years. It is really an ETA2836 dressed up to look like a 3135 but has the ETA layout. I think this thread is talking about the NEW movement that is supposed to actually be a copy of the Rolex 3135.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think you have the wrong movement there. Looks like you have the old '3135 look' movement thats been around for a couple years. It is really an ETA2836 dressed up to look like a 3135 but has the ETA layout. I think this thread is talking about the NEW movement that is supposed to actually be a copy of the Rolex 3135.

Yup. I just posted the pics to close my post here. Definitely a 2836 type movement with jeweling and some other parts/engravings to make it "look" 3135.

E

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm no Rolex expert, but this sure does not look like correct position for the crown on 16610 (I think it sits too low) - or maybe I'm wrong:

RLX-2011-10-24-01-04_enl.jpg

To me it looks quite like the real one in terms of positioning: Here is a pic of the genuine:

http://3.bp.blogspot...610-LN-Side.jpg

The position of the ETA one is lower.

http://www.yourtrustytime.com/bmz_cache/5/55cf500cef68e5fdd9691ddb782a9693.image.733x550.JPG

Edited by charlesdayton
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...
Please Sign In or Sign Up