jmb Posted August 23, 2015 Report Posted August 23, 2015 (edited) I saw this on fleabay this morning and 'bout fell outa my chair, don't ever remember seeing a BIN price this high B4! If somebody has a pile-o-cash laying around, and decides they have to have it, please post up some pics after you get it!http://www.ebay.com/itm/ROLEX-VINTAGE-DAYTONA-6263-BLACK-PAUL-NEWMAN-RCO-DIAL-STEEL-1969/201291047476? Edited August 23, 2015 by jmb
Nanuq Posted August 23, 2015 Report Posted August 23, 2015 I made an offer, hope he accepts "Ken's Left Nut"! I'll post photos if I win. Of the watch. 2
Sub007 Posted August 23, 2015 Report Posted August 23, 2015 Looking at the wear this has been someones daily beater once....1.1 million OMG that is crazy
jmb Posted August 23, 2015 Author Report Posted August 23, 2015 I made an offer, hope he accepts "Ken's Left Nut"! I'll post photos if I win. Of the watch.I'm glad you clarified that!
freddy333 Posted August 23, 2015 Report Posted August 23, 2015 Considering that watch originally retailed for less than $250 & frequently went for half that (often as a 'sweetener' to close the sale on another Rolex), that is quite a return on investment. You just cannot lose on vintage Rolex or Patek.
danielv2000 Posted August 23, 2015 Report Posted August 23, 2015 I guess John Mayer passed on this one so it's being offered to the plebs! 1
Revere Posted August 24, 2015 Report Posted August 24, 2015 (edited) My numbers here might not be right, but from a quick google search I think they are:I think this watch (famous RCO 6263, thought to be one of a kind so I think it's the same one?) sold for $1,089,106 USD in Nov 2013. Today, that money has a buying power of $1,115,747.41 USD. If this watch sells for the asking price, that means it will have yielded a profit of about $34,252 USD! Minus cost of insured shipping, of course...All in all, a 3% ROI does not seem so good for such an ultra high risk investment. Maybe Bob Maron is thinking the Daytona bubble isn't doing so well.... with a little more googling it looks like there may be more examples of RCO 6263s out there, so maybe Bob is fetching a nicer profit than I think!! Edited August 24, 2015 by CarlosFFF clarification
tienbang Posted August 25, 2015 Report Posted August 25, 2015 My numbers here might not be right, but from a quick google search I think they are:I think this watch (famous RCO 6263, thought to be one of a kind so I think it's the same one?) sold for $1,089,106 USD in Nov 2013. Today, that money has a buying power of $1,115,747.41 USD. If this watch sells for the asking price, that means it will have yielded a profit of about $34,252 USD! Minus cost of insured shipping, of course...All in all, a 3% ROI does not seem so good for such an ultra high risk investment. Maybe Bob Maron is thinking the Daytona bubble isn't doing so well.... with a little more googling it looks like there may be more examples of RCO 6263s out there, so maybe Bob is fetching a nicer profit than I think!!I have never sold anything over a $1,000 USD on ebay before but I'm assuming there's still that 10% ebay fee tacked on to each sale so that ROI goes all the way to zero and then some.
508-Fanatic Posted August 27, 2015 Report Posted August 27, 2015 I am pretty sure they had an article on this @Hodinkee where Rolex and many experts could not verify the authenticity of this RCO and Maron still snatched it up...because....Maron.
panda06 Posted August 27, 2015 Report Posted August 27, 2015 just put that price to be number one in the research list...free advertising
gasebah Posted August 27, 2015 Report Posted August 27, 2015 (edited) How about all RWG Members put their money together and we pass it around like a moving cup. Everyone can wear it for a month or so, and then it is passed over to the next guy. Edited August 27, 2015 by gasebah Typos.
508-Fanatic Posted August 27, 2015 Report Posted August 27, 2015 That sounds like a good idea except for all the bodily fluids that would be on it... ;-) 1
gasebah Posted August 27, 2015 Report Posted August 27, 2015 That sounds like a good idea except for all the bodily fluids that would be on it... ;-)LOL....that one took a while to settle in. :-) 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now