When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.
-
Posts
15,781 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
191
Everything posted by freddy333
-
Daytona 4130 movement GEN vs Clean disassembled pictures
freddy333 replied to CTime's topic in The Rolex Area
The Big Kahuna (116520) & The Golden Cuckoo (116508-0009).- 5 replies
-
- movement
- comparison
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
Daytona 4130 movement GEN vs Clean disassembled pictures
freddy333 replied to CTime's topic in The Rolex Area
CTime -- Thanks for the great photo layout. I have a Clean 116508 with the v1 A4130 & replaced many of the parts with gen parts (including balance & balance bridge), so I know the movement is an accurate clone. The V2 version looks better, but it would be nice if you could improve the pallets & bridges with stampings on them. I believe those are the weakest points, even in the V2. Otherwise, I have previously sung the praises of Clean in my recent Something, this way comes 1165xx Daytona threads.- 5 replies
-
- movement
- comparison
-
(and 3 more)
Tagged with:
-
Stem should be in winding position.
-
-
Of the 3 factory offerings on Andrew's site, I selected the 1 that contained the fewest & least objectionable sins to my eye. As always, others sensitivities may differ from mine, so you should carefully research each factory's offering & make your selection. Of course, if you are frankening your watch, everything but the case can be corrected with gen parts. But, as I said, out of the box, these are all so accurate that it is difficult to call them fakes, at least in the way we have traditionally classified non-Rolex-built Rolexes. 1 month ago, I set my franken 116520's time to our server's clock &, as of today, it is still within 1 sec of the server's clock. I continue to be amazed at the technical brilliance of the 4130's design & the Chinese ability to clone it for a fraction of the original's cost.
-
Followers of this thread may appreciate this (model number is actually 116508-0009) --
-
Never good to hear of others misfortune, but at least it resulted in RWG falling back into its proper hands. Hopefully, you are able to work things out in a way that is beneficial for both you & RWG.
-
-
I think either the AD was misinformed or you may have misunderstood them. Any certified Rolex watchmaker with a parts account should be able to work on your watch. Generally, only for vintage pieces, where a certified watchmaker is unable to verify a Rolex's provenance, might the watch have to be returned to a service centre. However, these days, due to cost-cutting, many ADs no longer maintain an in-house watchmaker of any level. In those cases, the watch would need to go the service centre.
-
There is some seriously heavy metal on this page, gentlemen.
-
-
Calling all the olde timers(get it) :-).........check in
freddy333 replied to Justasgood's topic in General Discussion
Welcome back, Luca. I do not know the details of your experience with the other member, but it is too bad your return was spoiled by an apparent deception. I know in the old days (when I was a member of the mod team), reports of abuse or questionable trades would come up from time to time & were ALWAYS taken seriously. But, unfortunately, you have to remember that private transactions between members are just that -- private. So there is really little RWG staff can or, really, should do other than to listen to both sides, if both sides are willing to accept a mediator. But, in the end, it is ultimately up to the 2 parties to sort things out, either between themselves or with the help of the payment agent (eg bank, paypal, etc). Good to hear you did finally acquire your grail. -
Sorry to hear you have had to deal with so many health issues, but glad to hear they have finally begun to abate. Get well soon.
-
Update -- After nearly 4 months of nearly daily driving, the Big Kahuna continues to exceed Rolex's specs -- running within +/- 1 sec/day! On my Timegrapher, in all positions, it returns no more than 2 secs deviation with 0.1% beat error and an amplitude of between 285-310. Typical rates for a modern, well-regulated 4130-powered Daytona. Because the fashionistas are now fixated on the latest, ceramic-bezeled models, these more understated, all-steel classics tend to fly below the-radar, which is more my style. & values for white, APH-dialed Daytonas (not counting the racy chrono sweep hand) are once again heading for the stratosphere.
-
This is the kind of creative spirit that made RWG famous.
-
I am not accepting any new work, but if this is a gen, why not have a local watchmaker with a Rolex parts account handle this?
-
Since a few people have messaged me asking about the rubber strap, here is a link to Horus rubber straps.
-
Yes, it looks like they installed a 16520 dial in a steel-surrounded, ceracrom bezeled 116500LN. That dial was never my cup of tea.
-
The 2023 Platinum Daytona (ref 126500) becomes the 1st sport model offered with a display caseback. It also has an updated 4131 movement. The 4131 is supposed to have a few less parts, but I do not know which parts were removed or why. What I do know is that the new movement is now decorated (not to my liking) & fitted with a skeletonized, yellow gold rotor & 'improved' ball-bearing system. I was not aware of any general problems with the 4130's rotor bearing, so the 'improvement' may be in manufacturing process & not the movement's performance. But, since they greatly increased the number of balls in the bearing (it looks like they went from 7 balls in the 4130 to 30 or 40 in the 4131), I am not sure about this? Rolex says 'the self-winding mechanism is also more durable thanks to the optimized ball bearing in the Perpetual rotor'. Rolex is now surrounding the ceracrom bezels with metal, which I imagine is designed to address the increasingly common problem of shattered bezels due to side impacts.
-
Condolences on your dad's passing. He had great taste in watches (I have the same model).
-
The movement is 1/3 of the chase. The movement & dial represent the other 2/3. But, however you look at it, no 1 part is useable without the other 2.
-
Good points. I still have a 23-300 with dial/handset that has been sitting on my bench for years awaiting a Patek case -- at this point, almost any Patek case that fits -- but none are to be found anymore. As automatico said, most have been sold off for their melt value &, even with inside contacts, Patek, like Rolex, will no longer sell or permit parts transfers out of the mother ship & its satellites.
-
I feel your pain (but the suffering is worse because I lack such an extensive collection of new/NOS Rolex crowns). If I gave an AD $10k for every time I have hidden an important Rolex part from myself, I would have enough to merit the privilege of buying a 116500 at retail.
-