Cost from ... where?
When I look on VRF, the 702's are quite expensive.
http://www.network54.com/Forum/207673/message/1369080870/FS+-+702+TUBEs+%26amp%3B+CROWNs
http://www.network54.com/Forum/207673/message/1364160976/FS+-+702+TUBE+%2B+CROWN
I appreciate the assurance of seniors members here on the board.
More eyes on it, the better.
Thank you all for your feedback.
Fingers crossed that it will install on my phong 1680 case.
I just picked these up and I think they are 7mm crowns for subs but I'm not sure.
I need some verification on them.
1. Gen or Rep?
2. 703? 702?
3. Are they period correct for a 1680?
Thanks Everyone
I would date your dial as Late 90's service dial made by Rolex, as it is Luminova
My Dial is the same as yours ("L" far left of the crown, Blatant Open 6) BUT my Service Dial was made by Beyeler for Rolex - Circa 1978 (Tritium and does NOT glow)
I love it
Beyeler Service Dial, Service Hands and Service Insert.
Nice Glow.. Vintage but Practical
There was much controversy over this supposed "Mark IV" Dial over at TRF
https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=193052
Looks like a mark III gen dial.
L slightly left of the crown
Closed 6
D extending past the E in SCOC
Beautiful canary patina
Matching hands
Service insert
Silver DW
I've been looking for a gen alternative to a 7206. The C&I versions are at least a couple hundred cheaper, but it's still $600+
Anyone have an good rep Rivet bracelet for sale?
The case looks good.. might want to thin out the CG's a bit to give it that worn/polished look.
The Crown is ... bad. first thing I would replace.
The bezel and the Fat Font insert/pearl looks good.
The dial is... meh. Second thing I would replace.
Great Build Overall though !!
Absolutely Amazing.
You just saved yourself 4k
Also that Mark I dial matches perfectly with the shaved Rehaut.
Now all you need is a flat 4 insert to be 100% period.