stilty Posted January 31, 2009 Report Share Posted January 31, 2009 Would a Freemason wear a rep or gen? What is considered moral? Strange questions, yes. But curious none the less. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronin Posted January 31, 2009 Report Share Posted January 31, 2009 (edited) Neither, they would wear this -or- -finally, god forbid- Seriously, to answer your question, I am thinking Gen. Edited January 31, 2009 by RoninQ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fakemaster Posted January 31, 2009 Report Share Posted January 31, 2009 Whatever they want. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
watcher Posted January 31, 2009 Report Share Posted January 31, 2009 Yes they would is the answer but can't tell you why Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KB Posted January 31, 2009 Report Share Posted January 31, 2009 Yes they would is the answer but can't tell you why I think you just did. Ken Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bvc Posted January 31, 2009 Report Share Posted January 31, 2009 No probs either way as long as its square! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
browngo1 Posted January 31, 2009 Report Share Posted January 31, 2009 No probs either way as long as its square! And on the level! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dluddy Posted January 31, 2009 Report Share Posted January 31, 2009 I bet Chuck Norris knows Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maxlawbr Posted January 31, 2009 Report Share Posted January 31, 2009 Rather be using a 24" gauge. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
automatico Posted January 31, 2009 Report Share Posted January 31, 2009 Put your mind at ease. All "genuines" are "replicas" anyway. Logic tells us: There is only one "genuine original" of everything made. Therefore: All that follow are "replicas". How so? For example...all "genuine" rolex 16610 submariners are assumed to be, well..."genuine", but only one can really be "genuine"...the "genuine original" (the first one made) and no one really knows where it is . (In a museum maybe?) Therefore: All the others are "replicas". Otoh, every "assumed to be replica" 16610 is different and unique, so they all must be considered to be "genuine originals". Proof: different cases, bezels, bracelets etc different fingerprints on the dial different hair in the movement different markers falling off the dial different threads stripped here and there etc, etc Therefore: Every "assumed to be replica" 16610 submariner is in reality a "genuine original" and all the "assumed be genuine" 16610 submariners sold by ADs etc are all "genuine replicas" (except the frst one made of course). I rest my case. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RobbieG Posted January 31, 2009 Report Share Posted January 31, 2009 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ztech Posted January 31, 2009 Report Share Posted January 31, 2009 Guys guys... you should know no self respecting freemason would ever wear a watch. They wear sundials and tell time by the stars. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jonthebhoy Posted February 1, 2009 Report Share Posted February 1, 2009 He'll wear what he sees the other guy wearing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Mentalist Posted February 1, 2009 Report Share Posted February 1, 2009 Freemasons wear fakes. I should know, I sold one to a Freemason. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now