chiman12 Posted September 16, 2010 Report Share Posted September 16, 2010 I excitedly rushed to the post office right after work today and picked up my spanking new PC (Josh) 1655! This is the new 1:1 version, but with the Asian movement. I wanted to explore the potential of the PC 1655, so I didn't upgrade to the more elaborate 2836 movement. I know there are already reviews in this forum, but I figured that this review would be coming from a little different point of view. Sssssssoooooo....let the good times roll!!!! I believe that I got the older version, because the markers don't quite touch the rehaut. None the less, the dial printing is crispy, the "II" is just the right size and not overinflated like on some of the NDT, Yuki, or J&W dials. The magnification of the cyclope is a bit weaker as compared to the gen 116 crystal and the faceted edge is finished really well...a good rep of a crystal! The bezel fonts are great, but they are a little thin, maybe slapping more gloss black paint on it would thicken the fonts up. As a few members mentioned already, the sore point of the piece is the hands. The 24 hour hand color is perfect for later 1655, but should be a bit more orange and match the lineage of the "T SWISS T" dial. The crown guards is well finished right out of the box. It may need a little bit of reworking, but otherwise, it could be left alone. As for the twin lock crown, I believe the asians perfected the production of this twinlock crown...most likely from all the various models of Datejusts that are produced!!! Now...on to the spotlight of this piece that everyone is talking about...the bracelet!!! The links are folded over and finished with perfection and speaks highly of the replication process to recreate this classic bracelet. The stamping on the clasp is deep and nice. None of the sloppiness that the old rep clasps had... Finally, the coronet on the clasp is stamped very well with slight distortion at the edges... Engravings between the lugs and in the case back are deep and tidy... Okay...your saying "so what chiman...this is just another f*cking boring review, what's the point? I know I'm going to buy the 1655 already because it is sssooo gggooooddd!!" NOW ON TO THE CHIMAN WATCH SURGERY TABLE...the destruction begins...I proceed to tear everything part... Oh look, no silly plastic retainer ring around the crystal...like on the 1665. The crystal fits tight via the bezel... Nice shot of the mid case and the asian movement... Now onto the goods...when I took the watch apart, I actually did some measurements for the RWG community, because everyone was asking if gen parts would fit "this" or "that". Bezel OD=37.75mm, ID=30.05mm Diameter of crystal seat on case OD=29.08mm Crystal OD=30.07mm Case ID (where the movement sits) = 28.20mm Width of rehaut opening on case=27.00mm Width of PC dial=27.95mm Now... I have a spare NDT 1655 dial handy and it is 27.37mm in diameter. So a gen-like dial will fit, but it would require some accuacy in trying to line up the 0.37mm difference with the rehaut opening. I also have an InGod dial and this measures in at 27.38mm The conclusion? The PC 1655 is a great rep and gen-like parts could fit onto PC 1655, and as a result, a great looking franken could be made cheaply. Now...time to determine the further potential of the 1655 case... 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lhooq Posted September 16, 2010 Report Share Posted September 16, 2010 Excellent tear-down, C! I think you sold me on this watch at the halfway point of the post. This could be the start of something big... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redwatch Posted September 16, 2010 Report Share Posted September 16, 2010 Nicely done!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronin Posted September 16, 2010 Report Share Posted September 16, 2010 Nice! Thanks for the measurements, wish more reviews included that level of detail. Since you went with the 21J, does that mean the GMT hand is fixed/sync'd on the 24hr time of the real hour? Also, did they just lop off the dial feet that would/might have been used on the ETA version? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FxrAndy Posted September 16, 2010 Report Share Posted September 16, 2010 Nice work mate Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TeeJay Posted September 16, 2010 Report Share Posted September 16, 2010 Looking good These always look fantastic in photos Nice! Thanks for the measurements, wish more reviews included that level of detail. Since you went with the 21J, does that mean the GMT hand is fixed/sync'd on the 24hr time of the real hour? Also, did they just lop off the dial feet that would/might have been used on the ETA version? That's how the movement of the original 1655 functioned... This was only ever intended as an AM/PM indicator watch, not a second timezone Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toadtorrent Posted September 16, 2010 Report Share Posted September 16, 2010 Great stuff. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alligoat Posted September 16, 2010 Report Share Posted September 16, 2010 Cool tear down, Chi! A couple of things that disappointed me, one, the laser etchings on the case and secondly, I would have liked to see the the flat top three's on the datewheel, can't tell if it's a silver finish color or not. A silver DW like the PT 1665 has would be cool. I prefer the whiter lume on the dial myself, and with a decent T-116 and some aging, it will be a very nice rep. Thanks for sharing this with us. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ubiquitous Posted September 16, 2010 Report Share Posted September 16, 2010 Great review, ChiMan! Nice to see the inner details and measurements! This one does have potential! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
permabull Posted September 16, 2010 Report Share Posted September 16, 2010 Great work, looks good for the $$. Now if only there was a safe way for us amateurs to make it look more "used"! Any ideas? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ubiquitous Posted September 16, 2010 Report Share Posted September 16, 2010 Now if only there was a safe way for us amateurs to make it look more "used"! Any ideas? My personal experience with aging is that nothing yields better results than actually just wearing the watch. Wear it every day for xx number of months and wear it while doing everything. And if I really want a watch to look beat up, I just let my wife wear it for a week I myself feel that a watch doesn't have to be beaten up to look it's part, however. I used to really like the look of heavy patina and wabi, but my preference has changed over time to preferring the look of a well kept, well cared for example. They still have their wear and tear marks, but I don't think a case has to be shaken amidst a jar full of screws and coins to look 30 or 40 years old either... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chiman12 Posted September 16, 2010 Author Report Share Posted September 16, 2010 Ronin...the asian movement actually has quick set functions and I'm not sure if the dial is glued on, but it should be no problem to disable the quick set function, on the ETA, it is simply one little gear. alli...it is white...and I agree with you on the etching, but it is better than the sloppy stamping they had on older reps... The reason I'm not not really concerned about the innards and the dial of the 1655 is that I want to try to convert it into a good looking 1675. Since, the 1655 is suppose to be 1:1 construction, it might make a good base for a 1675 project...so stay tuned!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cousin_hub Posted September 16, 2010 Report Share Posted September 16, 2010 Ronin...the asian movement actually has quick set functions and I'm not sure if the dial is glued on, but it should be no problem to disable the quick set function, on the ETA, it is simply one little gear. alli...it is white...and I agree with you on the etching, but it is better than the sloppy stamping they had on older reps... The reason I'm not not really concerned about the innards and the dial of the 1655 is that I want to try to convert it into a good looking 1675. Since, the 1655 is suppose to be 1:1 construction, it might make a good base for a 1675 project...so stay tuned!!!! Hi and do you think this Asian movement is reliable with a GMT fonction ? Regards Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rolexaddict Posted September 16, 2010 Report Share Posted September 16, 2010 the dial is not glued, it has 2 legs hold on the side by 2 screws. The same design like gen Rolex movements and almost the same feet position Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rolexmaniac88 Posted September 16, 2010 Report Share Posted September 16, 2010 Very nice review Chi! Sure makes me want one If I understood correctly, cheaps but nice mods would be to throw a clark crystal, drill the lug holes a bit, silver DW maybe, a straight second hand (no more problem with the dot) and work on the CG's a bit. Age the whole thing a bit and you've got yourself a pretty nice watch!!!! Might do that soon! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chiman12 Posted September 17, 2010 Author Report Share Posted September 17, 2010 rm88...this is correct...for a relatively cheap price and a little work and time invested, you'll have a really nice vintage rep! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
miquel Posted September 17, 2010 Report Share Posted September 17, 2010 Excellent Write-up Chi! I can't wait to see your 1675 conversion... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rolexaddict Posted September 17, 2010 Report Share Posted September 17, 2010 Excellent Write-up Chi! I can't wait to see your 1675 conversion... you are late, wake up Already done, Rolex 1675 specs bezel assembly and gen Cyclop 25-116 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Star69 Posted September 17, 2010 Report Share Posted September 17, 2010 now its getting interesting is that an aftermarket assembly ? cheers, Frank Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
miquel Posted September 17, 2010 Report Share Posted September 17, 2010 you are late, wake up Already done, I know, I've been following your progress and prototypes on the other forum... Great work! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
highoeyazmuhudee Posted September 17, 2010 Report Share Posted September 17, 2010 you are late, wake up Already done, Rolex 1675 specs bezel assembly and gen Cyclop 25-116 i didnt even think of that! franken GMT time! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lhooq Posted September 17, 2010 Report Share Posted September 17, 2010 Great... Now I have to buy two of these! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chiman12 Posted September 17, 2010 Author Report Share Posted September 17, 2010 you are late, wake up Already done, Rolex 1675 specs bezel assembly and gen Cyclop 25-116 Curse you Addict! It looks good! Your pic is making me excited for my 1675 project... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ubiquitous Posted September 17, 2010 Report Share Posted September 17, 2010 Chi- If you're going for a 1675, don't forget to swap the crown to a 5.3mm! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redwatch Posted September 17, 2010 Report Share Posted September 17, 2010 Wow now this is really getting intriguing! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now