Tribal Posted March 24, 2017 Report Posted March 24, 2017 With Cyclops and 43mm. Gesendet von meinem MI 4S mit Tapatalk
highoeyazmuhudee Posted March 24, 2017 Report Posted March 24, 2017 dont hate it. except for the crown guards (looks like a rep) but why the cyclops on the anniversary model? is it maybe because people who bought it the first time would now need glasses to read the date? 1
Tribal Posted March 24, 2017 Author Report Posted March 24, 2017 I think the cyclops is a no go on a Sea-dweller.Gesendet von meinem MI 4S mit Tapatalk 2
themannier Posted March 24, 2017 Report Posted March 24, 2017 I love it ! It's a sub for big wrist ! http://www.ablogtowatch.com/rolex-sea-dweller-126600-watch/
gasebah Posted March 24, 2017 Report Posted March 24, 2017 I all honesty I think this wall clock nonsense has to stop. 1
sgtguk Posted March 25, 2017 Report Posted March 25, 2017 I for one love the new design subdweller great look to it it'll keep quite a few people very happy and some not so much mainly the vintage heads (lol I'm one of em) think it's a great piece of Rolex marketing .......need to bag an SD pretty quick now too, prices are gonna go up up up Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
esco Posted March 25, 2017 Report Posted March 25, 2017 Lots of haters, but I think they've finally made the "goldilocks" watch for those who wanted a solution between the DSSD and the 40mm Sub/SDs. They did right with this one, it'll take time for folks to understand 43mm in rolex world is actually 42mm.
sgtguk Posted March 25, 2017 Report Posted March 25, 2017 Your right it has vastly more appeal for me than the deepsea ever did Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk 1
highoeyazmuhudee Posted March 26, 2017 Report Posted March 26, 2017 it has red on the dial, better add a few $$ to the msrp. collectors will flip this as being a "rare collectors piece" ad nauseum too, adding a few more $$$ to the price in aftermarket
hologramet Posted March 26, 2017 Report Posted March 26, 2017 Nicer lugs and overall shape, although 43mm here and there says nothing until I can see it on the wrist. The cyclops though... I would change that xtal ASAP if the overall fit was good and I liked it. 1
jigelow Posted March 26, 2017 Report Posted March 26, 2017 1 hour ago, hologramet said: Nicer lugs and overall shape, although 43mm here and there says nothing until I can see it on the wrist. The cyclops though... I would change that xtal ASAP if the overall fit was good and I liked it. Change it to what, though? At that size, there probably isn't a non-cyclops alternative out there.
hologramet Posted March 26, 2017 Report Posted March 26, 2017 15 minutes ago, jigelow said: Change it to what, though? At that size, there probably isn't a non-cyclops alternative out there. There's always an alternative somewhere... Worst case scenario. Remove the cyclops, chemically remove the AR on inner part of the xtal.
mini167 Posted March 27, 2017 Report Posted March 27, 2017 I think the cyclops is a no go on a Sea-dweller. +1
dieselpower Posted March 27, 2017 Report Posted March 27, 2017 It's not for me. Hi K btw, nice to see you back.
bxx Posted March 27, 2017 Report Posted March 27, 2017 not too keen on cyclops, the mater is at my age and eyesight its is becoming a must, sad to say. lmpo... 1
jmb Posted March 28, 2017 Report Posted March 28, 2017 I guess one good thing about these new Rollies, rep CGs will no longer be an instant "tell" anymore!
automatico Posted March 28, 2017 Report Posted March 28, 2017 "I guess one good thing about these new Rollies, rep CGs will no longer be an instant "tell" anymore!" Yep, the SD 4000 almost looks good enough to pass for a high grade replica.
TickleShoes Posted March 29, 2017 Report Posted March 29, 2017 I like the new movement! Glad to see they're progressing the internals even if the outside leaves much to be desired.
rolexfiend Posted March 29, 2017 Report Posted March 29, 2017 Never going to use it as a diver. Pointless edition and doesn't add any value / anything new.Sent from my SM-G925F using Tapatalk
mini167 Posted March 30, 2017 Report Posted March 30, 2017 I think that the cyclop is not in any sea-dweller 1
efthi Posted March 30, 2017 Report Posted March 30, 2017 Never going to use it as a diver. Pointless edition and doesn't add any value / anything new.Sent from my SM-G925F using TapatalkAdding new in what? Rolex brand in general? Because for the Sea Dweller is a major upgrade including new movement, new size, new bracelet, nice SEL design (at last for the SD) and of course the red text and the cyclops.. at the end it's a watch what else "new" should it has? From where I stand I am curious to see how it wears, I believe it will feel like a 42mm more than anything bigger and I see the crystal now sits lower and maybe overall thickness will feel smaller Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Tribal Posted April 7, 2017 Author Report Posted April 7, 2017 (edited) 22 minutes ago, Tribal said: Some more Pics. Edited April 7, 2017 by Tribal
panerai153 Posted April 8, 2017 Report Posted April 8, 2017 Sort of reminds me of a submariner on steroids!! Actually, it's not too bad. I would need to see one in the flesh and try it on before I really made up my mind. I will say, I had over the years three DSSD's, tried my best to love them, but for my wrist they were one of the poorest fitting watches I have owned. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now