Jump to content
When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.

Craytonic

Member
  • Posts

    1,283
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Craytonic

  1. Give me one Bob if you have too many!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :Jumpy:

    Been reading up on the Paul Neuman dials all day.

    http://forums.timezone.com/index.php?t=msg...d=0#msg_1377245

    is a good thread on the PN dials.

    What eactly makes a dial "exotic"?

    From Timezone:

    28946-294.jpg

    This may not be the best comparison since they are different dial colors but its a start..

    First. forget the bezels.. one is steel the other is plastic..

    The dials..

    The PN dial is on the right..black with white subdials...

    Things that are different on the dial..

    1. The outer ring on the dial with tracking numbers. In the PN is red tracking numbers(but it could be black or white.)

    2. Markers. They are a small square on the PN with small tritium dots.. In the regular dial, the markers are long.

    3. Subdials.. The font in the PN is more art-deco and the markers are a square with a "stick" connected to it. In the regular dial, its just a dash..

    4. The markings "SWISS" is usually below the six marker in the PN dial.

    5. Lastly, there is no tritium dots at 12 in the PN dial..never..

  2. I think The Zigmeister's had a change of heart with the new 7750's- Vast improvements have been made, and he has noted an overall improvement in their construction, build and parts quality.

    But if it's relating to which is better for a vintage Daytona... I'd take neither. I'll stick with my finicky, unreliable V23 copy movement :lol: It might be unreliable, but it's more 'correct' for the watch in terms of appearance and character.

    *shrug*

    I remember him saying that, but also hating them in the new daytonas (http://www.rwg.cc/members/index.php?showtopic=2805)

    Like that v23 eh? Like your women that way too, finicky, unreliable, but great subdials I bet? :thumbsupsmileyanim: Good taste.

  3. Wow wow wow nice pics. I think I need a paper towel. Woudn't need the hour subdial to time that one. I read your previous reviews of the DW, very informative. The one luckyyy has over at the DS is amazing as well.

    The black benz really adds something. I really appreciate all the info you have provided on this particuar watch. Now they just need a good steve mcQueen rep (I tried on the re-released gen in ATL, they had broken the crystal! Still refused to give me a good deal or replace it).

  4. Some people go as far as to "disable" the 6 o clock hand and lock it in place. This works fine and will never be a problem unless you need to use your stopwatch and count hours. But I never really actually use any of my chronos as stopwatches so its a nonissue for me. I would rather have reliability than accuarcy when it come to this issue.

    Great idea! I can't imagine clocking anything over an hour. Even if so its easy to just notice what hour it started on the main watch.

  5. ????? Da Vinci Code! :wounded1:

    I need someone to explains in plain English. :winkiss:

    hahahahaha. I thought that was plain english.

    • It is illegal to traffic in fake watches.
    • Charges are ok for one watch, and have been brought for two watches
    • A search warrant can be issued against you if the post office thinks you are "trafficking" in counterfit watches
    • If buying/owning is illegal depends on how courts interpret the "traffic" part of the law and "disposal" of watches
    • Courts can generally infer intent, so if you have 30 watches for personal use you are probably trafficking
    • If you only have one you may still be trafficking
    • You probably don't have anything to worry about, this is just for those who want to know
    • This is just for CRIMINAL, not CIVIL proceedings

    Also, "modding" is certainly illegal

  6. Evidence was insufficient to show that defendant had "trafficked or attempted to traffic" in 12 pairs of counterfeit socks where defendant was providing counterfeit socks to associate as samples, for which associate had not promised payment or anything in return; thus, there was no evidence that defendant was sending socks as consideration for anything of value.

    United States v Habegger (2004, CA4 NC) 370 F3d 441.

  7. Defendant's conviction for violation of Counterfeit Trademark Act, 18 USCS § 2320 was affirmed because trafficking in single good constituted as trafficking in "goods" under Act and there was no question that defendant's conduct occurred within five year limitations period under 18 USCS § 3282.

    United States v Foote (2005, CA10 Kan) 413 F3d 1240, 75 USPQ2d 1353.

×
×
  • Create New...
Please Sign In or Sign Up