Jump to content
When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.

ubiquitous

Platinum Member
  • Posts

    13,309
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    73

Posts posted by ubiquitous

  1. And, sometimes it's simply a matter of the factories using what parts they have on hand. Who knows- The casebacks might be from the assembly line of a different watch in production over a year ago! Factories are going to try to get away with spending as little as possible into operating and production expense as it cuts down on their overhead and adds to the profit margin. If they've already paid for these casebacks and simply have them laying around in their inventory (and of course, they work with the cases that they are using), it would probably make more sense to them to use those up before buying or tooling for a new batch.

  2. As this particular case directly impacts the servicing of genuine Rolex watches, I am certain that the specific topic of parts supply may be of more interest to the genuine Rolex enthusiast. The parties that have the most vested interest in the matter would be the owners of genuine vintage Sports models. Here's my logic and reasoning behind my statement- As Rolex Service Centers start turning away watches from the 60's/70's (i.e. 1520/5, 1570/5 etc. based watches), the collectors of said watches are going to have to start using resources outside of the typical RSC chain of command; i.e. independant watchmakers. If there are no genuine parts available (only aftermarket), then you can bet that most of the purists will begin dumping their watches and moving on to the manufacturers that actually support their vintage customers. This is already happening to a small degree as many of the serious collectors start moving towards Patek and AP (among many other brands). It's only a matter of time before more people start moving on, and then the vintage bubble will burst, which may have a ripple effect to sales of their modern lines as well (though not in a large impact, as Rolex will always have sales to some extent- There will always be those who want the brand purely for status reasons).

  3. Hmmmm... Looks to me like all that needs to be done is to have the seconds hand pressed back on. The 'pin' that the second hand is pressed onto is indeed part of the movement, and shouldn't be removed (as that would indeed be a bad thing).

    If you can, check to make sure that there isn't part of the pin/shaft still lodged in the seconds hand. If not, and you can still see part of the seconds hand pinion sticking up past the hinute hand, it should be a very simple fix.

  4. kruz-

    I agree with you on the continuous evolution of modifications and upgrades to favorite pieces. I don't know how many different dials, movements, crystals, bezels I've been through on my favorites, but I'm always looking for improvements where possible (though in many cases it's hard to beat genuine parts! :lol:)

    tmark-

    It's always difficult to say how long certain versions stay in production. A lot depends on how popular a specific model is. Seems that the mainstream models like the Subs, Seamasters, PAM's, etc are always cycling through evolution, and it's not uncommon to see a lot of overlap with watches of various points of origin and creation, while the more unique pieces like the IWC's, may not see any revisions or updates for a very long time.

  5. although sometimes there are bumos in the road and the next gen is actually inferior to the last.

    Indeed. With some revisions come great improvements and corrections to flaws that were present. However, one can most surely count on a number of features that were perfectly fine from prior versions to now be flawed. Apparently the old saying 'if it ain't broke, don't fix it' isn't taken into account when making updates to popular designs ;) Take 2 steps forward, then take 10 steps back...

    I find that in certain (many) cases, it almost pays to take several different revisions and combine them into one near perfect example, using the best of the best parts from each watch...

  6. I'd wear my DW 6263 at an AD. I would even pass it to them!

    I have done this numerous times with my DW's along with my MBW's as well. To me, my 'frankensteins' mean more to me than any of my gens, simply because I've had a hand in making them what they are.

    I wear my reps far more often than any of my other watches...

  7. Indeed- The low cost solution to getting a slow beat like the vintage is the 2846. It's a 21600bph movement, so the seconds hand has the same staggered sweep like the genuine 1570/5 (I'm looking at mine on my wrist while I type).

    The AS is a much better alternative as the date does rotate in the same direction as gen (counter-clockwise). I posted pics of my AS movements and gen datewheels in manuel's thread here. The genuine silver datewheels are expensive! And that's if you can find one (I spent a solid month looking for one, and luckily I ended up with two); the AS movements I purchased for $8 each. They run but only barely, so they'll need to be serviced and overhauled.

  8. How bad is the scratch? Is it down to the base metal? Or just a surface scratch?

    I have repaired several vintage matte black Rolex dials- An example:

    Before:

    57343-35273.jpg

    Note the scratch at the date window-

    57343-35274.jpg

    After:

    57343-35275.jpg

    The secret- I use a matte spray on varnish. Works great!

×
×
  • Create New...
Please Sign In or Sign Up