Jump to content
When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.

TeeJay

Member
  • Posts

    10,951
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    7

Posts posted by TeeJay

  1. Have to admit, I rather liked the TT Daytona. Couldn't've worn it myself (never been keen on gold aesthetically, and it brings me up in a rash for some reason :bangin: ) but I thought it looked like a pretty cool watch, and, at the end of the day, the Golden Rule, is if you're happy with it, and it feels good on your wrist, that's all that matters :drinks:

    PS That TT GMT really looks The Business :good::drinks:

  2. If you can find it, I would suggest luming the hands and dial with Revell Night-Color, or Americana Glow in the dark paint (product name and description :D ) It dries in a creamy off-white color which has a pretty vintage look to it, but it still glows pretty well for a few hours :)

  3. Have to agree, some reps are based on case constructions that are inherently designed to be waterproof, I don't get it, if the rep factories go to the trouble of machining gasket seats and then not actually putting gaskets in during the assembly phase, then that's just silly. And let's not kid ourselves, these reps are not cheap, they're just cheaper than their gen counterparts. That's the essential difference in Psychology between the Swiss-European standard of construction and the Chinese. it doesn't take much more to throw on a gasket, if everything else is already there, but those final details undo all the good work done previously. And if a 15 quid watch can do a better job of being waterproof without copying a proprietary, tested design, then what's the rep factories excuse?

    Rant over... :)

    Absolutely so :) I have a budget DateJust which I only ever wear on a leather strap, as it's as a replica of a costume piece from a show, but moving asside from that, when I first got the watch, if I recall, it fogged up during my flood test, despite having all appropriate gaskets :g: Maybe just a tiny breach around the crystal, and not really an issue when the watch is only ever worn on leather and never intended to get wet, but as you say, it's the principle of it... The DJ would've cost the factory more to make than the £15 sub, which has not just one, but two gaskets on the stem of the crown to create the water resistance, so as you say, what's the factory's excuse... :pardon:

    [Edit to add] The £15 sub is plastic...

  4. Looking good mate :thumbsupsmileyanim:

    With my bro T for this brisk Friday...79090!

    79090N.jpg

    Thanks, bro, although I must admit, the symmetry of the 79090 dial is way more attention-grabbing than mine :good::drinks:

    s'cuse me while I whip this out......

    Explorer002.jpg

    Explorer004.jpg

    Bad pics, but comfortable as hell :-)

    Enjoy your weekend, I will be "Explore"-ing. :drinks:

    That crystal's got to be a customized option :tu:

  5. The only things which really annoy me, are irrelevant to it being a rep, and just apply to watches in general... For me, I don't like:

    Weak lume (I'm not expecting C1 or SuperLuminova properties from the factory, but I do at least want the dial to be clear if lights go out...)

    Lack of water resistance (If a £15 Softech Submariner can be resistant enough for swimming/shower, what excuse is there for a rep to fog up?)

    Other than that, I'm pretty tolerant of the little inconsistencies and flaws in reps, which could just as easily be flaws in manufacture in a gen, as such things can/do happen :bangin:

  6. Welcome to the party :drinks: When it comes to artificially aging the watch, there're several schools of thought... Some of the best results I have seen, involved baking the dial, and then spraying with a few coats of wood stain. I've achieved mixed results on bezel inserts by gently sanding the insert, then bleaching for a few seconds. Ubiquitous has created the best faded inserts, but he keeps his method a closely guarded secret :shutup2: Aging the case, some people like to put the watch in a container with things like nuts and bolts, loose change, etc, and then shaking. The method I have used in the past, involved dragging the case against house bricks and ceramic tiles, and then using a 4-sided nail buffer to re-finish the case, and was quite happy with the results :) One thing's for sure, modifying watches is much more fun and satisfying than just strapping on one fresh from the box :good:

  7. I found a guy on ebay selling them for $8 but i have lost the link.

    Afterall, these probably cost about 15 cents to produce, so even $8 seems outrageous to me!

    dizz

    Thanks, I'll have a look and see what if there's anything floating about on eBay :)

    This is the Clark "Pearl Dot". I can't remember exactly how much they were but $12 seems to ring a bell...

    That's definitely what I had in mind, thanks :)

  8. for the real thing check the vintage forum; it will cost you an arm and a leg

    This is going to be very much a budget project, so vintage parts will be a nono, but thanks for the suggestion :) I guess this project is a case of seeing what I can achieve in terms of parts and modifications available commercially, but on a shoestring budget :)

×
×
  • Create New...
Please Sign In or Sign Up