Jump to content
When you buy through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission.

By-Tor

Diamond Member
  • Posts

    10,472
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    11

Posts posted by By-Tor

  1. Consider the Steelfish. I have the gen and also had the rep. The rep has some accuracy flaws, but it is mostly as good in terms of fit and finish. Very high quality reps tend to be judgeed by flaws these days, not build quality as those standards have come way up and many are nearly equal to their gen counterparts in that respect.

    I agree. SFSO isn't an amazing rep only because it's so accurate. It's the build quality which is just stunning. Very difficult to believe it's a rep actually... it's so well done.

  2. The difference between gen Omegas, Rolexes, Breitlings and TAGs vs. best reps are minimal. There are some, but people DO exaggerate them. Especially the ones that own genuines. Maybe that way they're trying to justify the price for themselves.

    Especially Rolex. There's very little difference between my gen Rolex GMT and the WM9 Sub... the rep feels heavier and sturdier (with the solid link bracelet). People who say they're "worlds apart" are definitely weird in my eyes.

    Gen PO is an amazing watch and one of the few "cheap luxury watches" that really is a good buy. Especially the 42mm model... the 4th Gen rep doesn't compare. UPO with an aftermarket AR coating is a different story... it can "replace" the gen (imho).

    PS: Yes, I agree. That was a weird 1st post.

  3. I don't think any of the classic models are great "investments", unless we're talking about decades when they become antique. But they're investments in the sense that you can always at least get your money back for the ones that you buy preowned now.

    Sea Dweller, GMT and Subs are the safest bets of keeping (or even slightly increasing) their value as the classic models are all going out of production. Maybe temporarily, maybe permanently... who knows... Explorer II's are rather cheap right now so they might be good buys. But I seriously doubt they're going to "skyrocket" or anything. There are too many of those watches out there.

    The new designs of Rolex don't seem to attract many WIS. That's why some people predict that the classic models might become more desirable.

  4. I've said it before and I say it again: It would be EXTREMELY NICE if people just filled the "location" in their profile. Not only in the sales threads, but many times a member is asking a general custom/shipping question without describing where he's from. If this small info was in his profile, the answer would be much easier to give immediately.

    EU / UK

    CONUS

    AUSTRALIA

    ASIA

    Europe (non EU)

  5. I've heard that lots of DS owners have sold it very quickly after buying one. Even the least objective Rolex fanboys don't seem to like how it wears and sits on the wrist.

    Personally, I think the DS is ugly as hell. Amazing watch technically though.

  6. The WM9 Sub I reviewed is the best 16610 without any doubt whatsoever. It's light years better than the MBW, and definitely NOT the same watch. The finish and fit of the SELs is superb. The crown is almost indistinguishable. Datewheel is amazing (unlike on the old WM9 model).

    The only thing missing are the pearl and super luminova (which George's new update will include).

    Cg's are also possible to modify to perfect condition. You only have to "straighten the insides" which even a clumsy guy like me can do.

    00258_IMG_0674_122_655lo.jpg

    Look at it from this angle. Anyone who has owned gen Subs and GMTs know how it should look... and WM9 is absolutely spot on. George must be doing something right. For $330 w/ gen ETA this is a great buy (imho).

    IMG_0703.jpg

×
×
  • Create New...
Please Sign In or Sign Up