TeeJay
-
Posts
10,951 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
7
Posts posted by TeeJay
-
-
Had you considered the 029a? Admitedly, not one which sees much wrist time, but definitely one of the favorites of my collection
-
The standard by which I choose my watches is easy. No glaring errors in spelling. ie: Polex, Qmega, Paneroo. (I admit, I would like a really bad FAKE Rolex for my collection, but other than that, I like things to be spelled properly) Other than that, I'm pretty tollerant.
Sapphire crystals are good, but I don't demand them. I've lived with scuffed up watch crystals my entire life, I'm not going to start getting snobby about it now I wear nicer watches.
AR is something I can take or leave. My PVD 111g has AR, and to be honest, sometimes, the blue/purple glaze irritates me. If I wanted a watch with a blue/purple dial, I'd've chosen one with one. When I was unwrapping the watch, my very first time setting eyes on it, it had a case protector on it, and it caught the light so the dial appeared blue/purple, and my heart sank. I thought I'd been sent a watch with a blue dial. It wasn't until I got it unwrapped (and now significantly disheartened) that I realized it was just AR coating. I've come to appreciate it, but, nothing will take back that initial shock, and, as mentioned, the glaze can irritate me. I believe my 127 has some kind of AR coating, as there will occasionally be a blue/purple 'ghost reflection' of a light point (visible in the photos I've taken of it) If there is an AR coating, it is way more subtle than on the 111g, and never gives the blue/purple glaze, so that doesn't bother me.
Fidelity of replication depends on the detail in question. I don't mind that my Planet Ocean is on a Seamaster strap, nor that the hour batons are a hair too thin. I would mind, however, if the spelling was wrong, font not properly centered or oriented correctly (one end of the text higher than the other)
I don't wear rep watches to try and convince people I'm some high-roller with a fancy collection, I wear them because I like watches and am not prepared to pay artificially inflated retail prices. $20'000 for a 127?? [censored] that [censored]! I could put a deposit on a mortgage or buy a car for that money. I don't demand the same level of fidelity in replication that some do, because I don't want to pass the watches off as their genuine counterparts. As long as they are reasonably close in appearance to how the original looks, that is good enough to satisfy my collecting requirements. Accuracy of spelling is something I want for my appreciation, not someone else's, and, at the end of the day, is simply a matter of a product being made properly, rather than sloppily, and with no attention to detail.
-
Over half of the watches I bought from Trusty had problems, none from Silix have. I just assumed Silix QC'd their watches but maybe it was just luck
look at the issues I had with my X-33 (and its replacement), and the vintage Rolex which was the wrong model... No QC there... I think you got lucky, amigo
-
I've got the Pam bug and am lining up a radiomir to add to my modest collection... thought I'd ride this thread - do you guys prefer the cali dial or something like the 232 (see below - image from Davidsens web... hope no-one minds)?
Cheers
Sam
Welcome to the party
Personal preference is such a touchy issue... I would very much like a California for my collection, but, I doubt it would see much in the way of regular wrist-time as I prefer the more unified look of other dials. In terms of what I would wear regularly (were my 127 not glued to my wrist 
) it would be something like the 210 or 232 -
I'm in love with the "Vintage 47mm Radiomir California Dial Swan neck" Joshua has...
I have 2 concerns though:
- Crystal: - Doom Plexi Plastic
- Swiss Unitas 6497 Swan neck regulator Manual Hand wind Movement
can someone give me a little review/insight on this? How bad is winding the watch? How long does a wind last? Also how does the crystal look IRL? I love the Dial, size and look of this watch, I just wish it was available in an auto option (I just don't know if I'll like autos...). I also wonder how the crystal will hold up over time.
Thanks for any info anyone can share.
Coming from quartz, then automatics, to manual winding, I would agree that at first, it can seem strange to have to wind a watch rather than letting it 'take care of itself', like quartz and automatics do, but, like anything, that's just the initial 'shakedown' period, and, after a while, having to wind the watch becomes part of the pleasure in owning and using one.
I tend to wind my watches every night before going to bed, just so they never run to a stop (which could go unnoticed for some time, and then lead to the hassle of having to re-set the watch). Even if I forget to do so, I know that the watch won't stop overnight, and as soon as I remember, I just wind it, it's really not a chore at all. Personally, I view having to wind the watch as 'my part of the bargain': I need the watch to know the time. The watch needs me to wind it so it can tell the time. I keep it wound, it keeps telling me the time
In terms of the watch itself, as mentioned, the California dial was never produced in the sandwich form (which I would admit to being my preferencial form as well) Initially, I was not too keen on the California, as I didn't particularly like the mixed fonts. One or the other would be fine, but not both. Serves no purpose. However. As I have come to know more about the history of Panerai as a company, I can appreciate the watch's historical value, so can certainly see it's appeal (for either reason) and will likely purchase one myself to round out my collection.
In terms of Radiomirs in general, I've heard that they can have the same issue with crown strippage as dogged the Planet Oceans... Can anyone shed any light on this?
- Crystal: - Doom Plexi Plastic
-
If it was later in the year, I'd definitely try and make it, but by the end of Feb, I just couldn't. Too many financial commitments and a trip for a birthday in late Feb have pretty much taken all my spare cash for a while. It now turns out, I'm likely to be heading over to Japan some time during the year (Yes, I would like to go, but, now my fiance's got the idea in her head, we're going to have to make it happen, and the cost of that isn't going to be chump-change...
) When a date's decided, let me know, and if I can make it, I'll certainly do my utmost to attend. I'm not scared of meeting folks off the net, belonging to an online tattoo community means I'm pretty used to it. My only reasons for not attending, will be purely financial. Of course, had the scumbag who still owes me -
well i prefer Sporty llok. So im in between #2 & # 4 straps on my previous post....
For sporty, I'd definitely suggest the 'carbon' straps, rather than #2, but to be honest, I think that the rubber straps are as sporty as it gets, other than the OEM Velcro strap, they're (the rubber straps) certainly the most functional in that regard...
Here's a link to the other 187 I was refering to. Just looking at it makes me want to get one for my collection, even though I know I'd likely never wear it unless I went camping/hiking/on some kind of expedition, which is a shame, as it's an awesome looking watch
-
which one of the following will fit better me PAM187?
Depends.
What kind of 'look' do you want the watch to project? Casual? Functional? Smart? Do you want it to match your shoes?
All those things must be taken into consideration as to what will fit the watch better. Pugwash showed a fantastic PAM 187 on a very beaten brown strap. Looked absolutely [censored]ing awesome. Totally different look to how it would be on rubber.
When I first ordered my 127, I thought it would just be a watch I wore on odd occasions, figuring it wouldn't go under shirt-cuffs easily, and that it's too big to be elegant, so I'd still need to buy a 'dress watch', but, I was wrong. The watch is incredibly versatile. A honey/tan strap, and it looks casual, excellent for jeans and a sweater. A black strap makes it more formal, but, to be truly formal, it needs to be on a black Alligator strap with white stitching. The black rubber strap, makes it casual, but 'informal casual' rather than 'smart casual', and, depending on the smartness of the outfit, blends 'up or down' accordingly. It also makes the watch look 'more modern'.
So, thats what you need to consider, before considering what strap would best fit the 187
-
I knew you'd LOVE it! I think I posted a Wristcheck when you were away...
I got it on Risti from IIRC, some Swedish guy who was selling it for $200 (new). I bargained him down to $170. It had the original OEM baggie from the Firenze shop.
It's absolutely gorgeous
IWANTITIWANTITIWANTITIWANTIT 
I don't suppose you have any plans for selling it in the near future have you
Oh well, back to the searching
-
THURSDAY
Here's the "TeeJay" shot: the TWP PAM 210 on the Caoutchouc Rubber Diver strap. Looks like a Moon Landing.
That combo might not be to everyone's taste, and, when worn by an elegant lady, rather incongruous to the overall attire, but, that really will be perfect for my friend
That first shot is awesome. I have a hunch he's going to love this watch (which will have a deployant clasp fitted, for previously discussed reasons )Thanks again for putting the combo together so I could see it. It looks exactly as I visualized, a contradiction of chunkiness and elegance, but, it will suit my friend perfectly.
As for my own wrist, I've got the 127 back on the honey/tan sharkskin. (I was also wearing the same jeans/sweater/shoes/jacket as when I first took the pic, (Yes, they have been washed in between
) so, it might not be 'fresh', but it's still accurate)
-
(L to R: Zeugma #187, OEM Bordeaux "The Orlando Bloom")
*Sees the strap*
My Precio- Sorry, I started chanelling Gollum there...
Where did you track down the OEM Bordeaux? I've been hitting up Google, yet having no luck at all...
-
Nice buy
I'm surprized buy your thoughts on the bracelet though. I've always found the rep PAM bracelets to be very solid, and, although the replease is a little fiddly, that's good... That means the clasp is unlikely to spring open under normal wear
Also, the parts themselves composing the bracelet and the clasp mechanism, are nicely machined metal chunks. Way more durable than the flimsy, stamped metal in a Rolex clasp Of course, that's just my own feelings on them. A nice padded black leather strap would look awesome on that watch. There's one in particular (which I can never remember where it's from) which has a 'perforated' surface which would complement the texture of the dial perfectly -
wow those pics are awesome. I want a 210 sporting black rubber.... the quest begins....
You won't find one as a straight out purchase, but I'm sure your dealer of choice would be able to make the necessary strap exchange for you
-
@TeeJay: I only mention the size because you said you have 24mm buckles mostly? So if it doesn't come with one, you might be stuck in gifting him it. Also, I'm glad it's 26/22 since that produces the right amount of "taper" the Radiomirs REALLY should have -- they look more elegant than with a chunky 26/26.
Ahh, I see your confusion. I have three 22mm 'thumbnail' buckles which came with my 111h/111g/029a's factory straps, two 24mm pre-V buckles, which I ordered for the BOB straps, the 22mm buckle which came on my 26/22 dive strap, and the 26mm pre-V buckle which came with my 127's factory strap (since replaced with BOB straps, but still with the factory buckle)
When I order the watch, I'll ask for it to have the dive strap fitted, and that'll come with a suitable buckle, so I won't be losing any of mine
I really ought to take a PAMily photo of them all -
TBH, it looks w.ank.
I agree, but, my friend's idea of 'dressing up', is black jeans, trainers, and a short-sleeved 'fashion' shirt
Believe me, it'll suit his wardrobe perfectly But if these shots can be of service to your chum and to others, so much the better! My pleasure indeed. Point of interest: this strap seems to be a very rare 26/22 size. Usually they're 26/26 or 26/24.Interesting indeed
Mine's 26/22 as well Thanks again for the combo shots
-
TWP PAM 210 with Caoutchouc-style Rubber Diver strap:
(Sorry for the delay! It was raining most of today, hence the darkness of the shots)
That's absolutley fantastic
As mentioned, not sure if it would be most people's cup of tea, but, my friend's 'aesthetics' are somewhat 'unique', and it should suit him perfectly Thanks for doing the test fit for me -
@#2: Gotcha. I'll try to shoot these in 2 hours, as I'm only just waking up.
...meanwhile, this shouldn't prevent any other member from providing a photo of said strap on the Radiomirs! Please. Help a brother out. Awsome, but no hurry
I'll be interested to see the result, and people's opinion of it You got a wristshot of this combo, would like to see itIt's on it's way
-
I'll put on that diver strap you got on the Fiddy for it (OEM Caoutchouc-style).
Otherwise, I can place the more usual 24mm one, which might show a lot of lugwire though. I'm not doing both even for you. Radiomirs are a PAIN to change straps.
@Followup: Try RWI's sales section. They have those rubber straps much more often than here...if you want a cheap one, Tony can get it for you, I'm sure! I got mine from TWP.
Indeed, that's the strap I was thinking of, not the 24mm one
Lugwire exposure asside, I don't think my friend would want something with the branding so visible like that strap is. Indeed, Tony was going to be my port of call. I know he sells other PAMs with that strap, so I'm sure he could swap one over for me
Looking forward to seeing the pic of it, I have a hunch it'll look... Well, maybe not 'good' by most people's standards, but something my friend would like
-
@TeeJay below: The 45mm/47mm Radiomirs are said to look best with the 27/22mm straps, so slightly larger than the 26mm ones, but tapered down. HOWEVER, I have put on my Fiddy straps (26mm) on them, and they're fine. Heck, I even place the 24mm on them too...they expose too much of the lug wires, though. Not the way to go.
In that case, a 127-type dive strap should look okay... Might be the way to go for this gift project.
As a side-note, I've got my 127 on the dive strap today, and it's soo comfy. Certainly not getting rid of this strap, I'll just have to source another for my friend
-
TeeJay, do you know I never even THOUGHT of putting my 210 on a rubber strap? And mind, the 210 looks best with black straps.
I'm a bit lazy today, but I promise to give you a rubber diver strap shot on my (only working) Radiomir later today!
I have to admit, it's not a combination I would've thought of for myself, but the thing that got me thinking, is that I've seen Radiomir straps advertized as 26/22, so wondered (if that was a standard Radiomir size) if the dive strap which fits the 127 would be the right size, or if it would be the dive strap with 'Officine Panerai' on the sections...
Probably not a combination many people would even like, but it'd probably go best with my friend's wardrobe
-
Hey TeeJay hows it going
How about this one
Very hard to find a picture of an original design Radiomir on a rubber strap, there must be someone out there who has put one on a rubber strap thought.That wasn't quite the model I was thinking of
If there aren't any pics available, if someone could let me know what size strap the 45mm radiomir takes, that would be great, as that way, I could just track down an appropriately sized strap
-
A friend's birthday is coming up, and I was thinking about getting them a Radiomir. He wears his watch on the left wrist, but, I have a hunch that he'd find the crownguard of the Luminor models irritating, so think the Radiomir is the way to go. However, in terms of straps, I think customization is the answer. He's not a 'corporate smart' kind of guy, neither is he really 'smart casual' in the American sense of the work (ie David Boreanaz in Buffy/Angel) but more a jeans and smart-ish shirt kind of guy, so I figure a rubber strap might be more fitting with his wardrobe, but wondered if anyone had any pics of such a combination, just to give me an idea how it'd look before committing to buy.
Thanks in advance
-
The 42mm version is available with a rubber strap. If you want to ensure the strap fits the watch properly (there is some variation between the watches and the actual strap used, as many POs sold on rubber, are being sold on the Seamaster rubber strap, not the Planet Ocean rubber strap, and that does make a difference) your best bet is to order the watch from the dealer already fitted with the rubber strap. You can always ask them for a seperate SS Bracelet as well, but, if the fit of the rubber is important, ask for it to be thus fitted. Personally, I've found that the rubber straps make the watch hard to get under a shirt cuff, which is not a problem on SS. However. The SS bracelet makes the watch heavier, and more noticeable against the hand, where on the rubber strap, you'll forget you even have the watch on.
In terms of size, I think it's just a matter of personal taste, but the 45mm really isn't unwearably large. WHen I first saw one, I thought it was a big watch, but, when I bought one, I soon got used to it. Having worn Panerai for a few months, when I put my 45mm PO back on for a few minutes, I thought it looked small
It's just a matter of perspective, and getting used to it. In terms of watches, the Planet Ocean is a fantastic one, and one of my design favorites. Best of luck with your purchase -
The iPhone has many shortcomings, but this guy lists some things that probably only he cares about. Many of my coworkers have iPhones and the first thing that jumps out at me is how slow they are. So before considering any of its other flaws, just ask yourself if EDGE is fast enough for your needs. The lack of 3G/UTMS support is one of the biggest iPhone blunders IMO. If you get passed that, then try to use the touch screen keyboard a bit to see how you like it. For me and many people I know, that touch screen keyboard is very difficult and frustrating to use. I was relegated to using only my pinkie finger to type mails/messages, and even then I only had about a 75% success rate.
If you can live with the fact that the iPhone is not as robust as other phones, then maybe it's a good choice for you. It is, after all, a neat gadget. On the other hand, if can live with its shortcomings, then perhaps you don't really even need a smart phone...
I've tinkered around with the display models (they have a load in the middle of the store, so people can just play around with them) and I'd agree about the keyboard. While I was able to use it, it was awkward to do so, and, while it was okay to use for a while, I don't think I'd want to use it for extended periods. I think the main sentiment I've picked up for iPhones, is that they're very much 'flash' rather than 'substance'. I think one of the iClones available will be adequate for my needs
Accuracy? I'm sure it's accurate in its own way. However, many of his points are like "My soup blender can't grind coffee beans".I don't live anywhere with good 3G (or even consistent Edge) coverage and am relegated to GPRS most of the time. Speedwise, it's ok as long as I'm not trying to stream video, and it's more than fast enough for email and browsing the BBC News site. However, I am usually not far from a WiFi spot.
The iPhone isn't ideal for everyone, much like the Blackberry isn't for everyone, either.
I've been thinking about getting a PDA-style phone for several years, but never really got round to it. The iPhone caught my attention, but, from what I've read, I think a Cect P168 will be adequate for my needs
Standards for buying reps
in General Discussion
Posted
Bazz, sorry I couldn't reply properly to your post sooner. I've read about these 'colored coatings' on crystals before, but, I really do not believe that that is what is on my 111g (and certainly not my 127) Such coatings would surely be visible at all times (even if only faintly) The coating on my 111g is only visible under certain reflective conditions, and, on my 127, only appears as a displaced reflection of a light-source, never as a total 'covering' (although the different qualities of the 127, I attribute to the refractive differences of the differently shaped crystal) I would have thought that the 'purple coats' would be visible at all times, and as total coverage, rather than just points of reflection (under normal lighting conditions) or a total 'wipe out' under specially created lighting conditions.
The anti-reflective coats on our watch crystals are (to the best of my knowledge) no different to the anti-reflective coats on spectacle lenses. Do you wear glasses yourself? And, if so, do you have AR coating on the lenses? (or know anyone who does?) If you hold them to face a light-source (like a bulb, rather than a more diffused lighting) there will still be a reflection on the lens, it will just be a greenish color, and less visible than it would be on an un-coated lens. AR coatings do not totally eliminate reflections, they just greatly reduce them...